Researcher profile

Dionysios Manessis

Dionysios Manessis contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

Engineer the Channel and Adapt to it: Enabling Wireless Intra-Chip Communication

Ubiquitous multicore processors nowadays rely on an integrated packet-switched network for cores to exchange and share data. The performance of these intra-chip networks is a key determinant of the processor speed and, at high core counts, becomes an important bottleneck due to scalability issues. To address this, several works propose the use of mm-wave wireless interconnects for intra-chip communication and demonstrate that, thanks to their low-latency broadcast and system-level flexibility, this new paradigm could break the scalability barriers of current multicore architectures. However, these same works assume 10+ Gb/s speeds and efficiencies close to 1 pJ/bit without a proper understanding on the wireless intra-chip channel. This paper first demonstrates that such assumptions do not hold in the context of commercial chips by evaluating losses and dispersion in them. Then, we leverage the system's monolithic nature to engineer the channel, this is, to optimize its frequency response by carefully choosing the chip package dimensions. Finally, we exploit the static nature of the channel to adapt to it, pushing efficiency-speed limits with simple tweaks at the physical layer. Our methods reduce the path loss and delay spread of a simulated commercial chip by 47 dB and 7.3x, respectively, enabling intra-chip wireless communications over 10 Gb/s and only 3.1 dB away from the dispersion-free case.

preprint2020arXiv

Exploration of Intercell Wireless Millimeter-Wave Communication in the Landscape of Intelligent Metasurfaces

Software-defined metasurfaces are electromagnetically ultra-thin, artificial components that can provide engineered and externally controllable functionalities. The control over these functionalities is enabled by the metasurface tunability, which is implemented by embedded electronic circuits that modify locally the surface resistance and reactance. Integrating controllers within the metasurface cells, able to intercommunicate and adaptively reconfigure it, thus imparting a desired electromagnetic operation, opens the path towards the creation of an artificially intelligent (AI) fabric where each unit cell can have its own sensing, programmable computing, and actuation facilities. In this work we take a crucial step towards bringing the AI metasurface technology to emerging applications, in particular exploring the wireless mm-wave intercell communication capabilities in a software-defined HyperSurface designed for operation is the microwave regime. We examine three different wireless communication channels within the landscape of the reflective metasurface: Firstly, in the layer where the control electronics of the HyperSurface lie, secondly inside a dedicated layer enclosed between two metallic plates, and, thirdly, inside the metasurface itself. For each case we examine the physical implementation of the mm-wave transponder nodes, we quantify communication channel metrics, and we identify complexity vs. performance trade-offs.