BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Dietmar Pfahl

Dietmar Pfahl contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Software EngineeringGeneral Literature

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
7works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

7 published item(s)

preprint2023arXiv

Exploring a Test Data-Driven Method for Selecting and Constraining Metamorphic Relations

Identifying and selecting high-quality Metamorphic Relations (MRs) is a challenge in Metamorphic Testing (MT). While some techniques for automatically selecting MRs have been proposed, they are either domain-specific or rely on strict assumptions about the applicability of a pre-defined MRs. This paper presents a preliminary evaluation of MetaTrimmer, a method for selecting and constraining MRs based on test data. MetaTrimmer comprises three steps: generating random test data inputs for the SUT (Step 1), performing test data transformations and logging MR violations (Step 2), and conducting manual inspections to derive constraints (Step 3). The novelty of MetaTrimmer is its avoidance of complex prediction models that require labeled datasets regarding the applicability of MRs. Moreover, MetaTrimmer facilitates the seamless integration of MT with advanced fuzzing for test data generation. In a preliminary evaluation, MetaTrimmer shows the potential to overcome existing limitations and enhance MR effectiveness.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2023arXiv

Towards Automatic Generation of Amplified Regression Test Oracles

Regression testing is crucial in ensuring that pure code refactoring does not adversely affect existing software functionality, but it can be expensive, accounting for half the cost of software maintenance. Automated test case generation reduces effort but may generate weak test suites. Test amplification is a promising solution that enhances tests by generating additional or improving existing ones, increasing test coverage, but it faces the test oracle problem. To address this, we propose a test oracle derivation approach that uses object state data produced during System Under Test (SUT) test execution to amplify regression test oracles. The approach monitors the object state during test execution and compares it to the previous version to detect any changes in relation to the SUT's intended behaviour. Our preliminary evaluation shows that the proposed approach can enhance the detection of behaviour changes substantially, providing initial evidence of its effectiveness.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

A Replication Study on Predicting Metamorphic Relations at Unit Testing Level

Metamorphic Testing (MT) addresses the test oracle problem by examining the relations between inputs and outputs of test executions. Such relations are known as Metamorphic Relations (MRs). In current practice, identifying and selecting suitable MRs is usually a challenging manual task, requiring a thorough grasp of the SUT and its application domain. Thus, Kanewala et al. proposed the Predicting Metamorphic Relations (PMR) approach to automatically suggest MRs from a list of six pre-defined MRs for testing newly developed methods. PMR is based on a classification model trained on features extracted from the control-flow graph (CFG) of 100 Java methods. In our replication study, we explore the generalizability of PMR. First, we rebuild the entire preprocessing and training pipeline and repeat the original study in a close replication to verify the reported results and establish the basis for further experiments. Second, we perform a conceptual replication to explore the reusability of the PMR model trained on CFGs from Java methods in the first step for functionally identical methods implemented in Python and C++. Finally, we retrain the model on the CFGs from the Python and C++ methods to investigate the dependence on programming language and implementation details. We were able to successfully replicate the original study achieving comparable results for the Java methods set. However, the prediction performance of the Java-based classifiers significantly decreases when applied to functionally equivalent Python and C++ methods despite using only CFG features to abstract from language details. Since the performance improved again when the classifiers were retrained on the CFGs of the methods written in Python and C++, we conclude that the PMR approach can be generalized, but only when classifiers are developed starting from code artefacts in the used programming language.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Using Source Code Metrics for Predicting Metamorphic Relations at Method Level

Metamorphic testing (TM) examines the relations between inputs and outputs of test runs. These relations are known as metamorphic relations (MR). Currently, MRs are handpicked and require in-depth knowledge of the System Under Test (SUT), as well as its problem domain. As a result, the identification and selection of high-quality MRs is a challenge. \citeauthor{PMR1} suggested the Predicting Metamorphic Relations (PMR) approach for automatic prediction of applicable MRs picked from a predefined list. PMR is based on a Support Vector Machine (SVM) model using features derived from the Control Flow Graphs (CFGs) of 100 Java methods. The original study of \citeauthor{PMR1} showed encouraging results, but developing classification models from CFG-related features is costly. In this paper, we aim at developing a PMR approach that is less costly without losing performance. We complement the original PMR approach by considering other than CFG-related features. We define 21 features that can be directly extracted from source code and build several classifiers, including SVM models. Our results indicate that using the original CFG-based method-level features, in particular for a SVM with random walk kernel (RWK), achieve better predictions in terms of AUC-ROC for most of the candidate MRs than our models. However, for one of the candidate MRs, using source code features achieved the best AUC-ROC result (greater than 0.8).

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Catching up with Method and Process Practice: An Industry-Informed Baseline for Researchers

Software development methods are usually not applied by the book. Companies are under pressure to continuously deploy software products that meet market needs and stakeholders' requests. To implement efficient and effective development processes, companies utilize multiple frameworks, methods and practices, and combine these into hybrid methods. A common combination contains a rich management framework to organize and steer projects complemented with a number of smaller practices providing the development teams with tools to complete their tasks. In this paper, based on 732 data points collected through an international survey, we study the software development process use in practice. Our results show that 76.8% of the companies implement hybrid methods. Company size as well as the strategy in devising and evolving hybrid methods affect the suitability of the chosen process to reach company or project goals. Our findings show that companies that combine planned improvement programs with process evolution can increase their process' suitability by up to 5%.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Empirical Standards for Software Engineering Research

Empirical Standards are natural-language models of a scientific community's expectations for a specific kind of study (e.g. a questionnaire survey). The ACM SIGSOFT Paper and Peer Review Quality Initiative generated empirical standards for research methods commonly used in software engineering. These living documents, which should be continuously revised to reflect evolving consensus around research best practices, will improve research quality and make peer review more effective, reliable, transparent and fair.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

What are Hybrid Development Methods Made Of? An Evidence-based Characterization

Among the multitude of software development processes available, hardly any is used by the book. Regardless of company size or industry sector, a majority of project teams and companies use customized processes that combine different development methods -- so-called hybrid development methods. Even though such hybrid development methods are highly individualized, a common understanding of how to systematically construct synergetic practices is missing. In this paper, we make a first step towards devising such guidelines. Grounded in 1,467 data points from a large-scale online survey among practitioners, we study the current state of practice in process use to answer the question: What are hybrid development methods made of? Our findings reveal that only eight methods and few practices build the core of modern software development. This small set allows for statistically constructing hybrid development methods. Using an 85% agreement level in the participants' selections, we provide two examples illustrating how hybrid development methods are characterized by the practices they are made of. Our evidence-based analysis approach lays the foundation for devising hybrid development methods.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access