Researcher profile

DianChao Lin

DianChao Lin contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
3topics
2close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

A User-Based Charge and Subsidy Scheme for Single O-D Network Mobility Management

We propose a path guidance system with a user-based charge and subsidy (UBCS) scheme for single O-D network mobility management. Users who are willing to join the scheme (subscribers) can submit travel requests along with their VOTs to the system before traveling. Those who are not willing to join (outsiders) only need to submit travel requests to the system. Our system will give all users path guidance from their origins to their destinations, and collect a \emph{path payment} from the UBCS subscribers. Subscribers will be charged or subsided in a way that renders the UBCS strategy-proof, revenue-neutral, and Pareto-improving. A numerical example shows that the UBCS scheme is equitable and progressive.

preprint2020arXiv

Comparative Analysis of Economic Instruments in Intersection Operation: A User-Based Perspective

Focusing on different economic instruments implemented in intersection operations under a connected environment, this paper analyzes their advantages and disadvantages from the travelers' perspective. Travelers' concerns revolve around whether a new instrument is easy to learn and operate, whether it can save time or money, and whether it can reduce the rich-poor gap. After a comparative analysis, we found that both credit and free-market schemes can benefit users. Second-price auctions can only benefit high VOT vehicles. From the perspective of technology deployment and adoption, a credit scheme is not easy to learn and operate for travelers.

preprint2020arXiv

Pay for Intersection Priority: A Free Market Mechanism for Connected Vehicles

The rapid development and deployment of vehicle technologies offer opportunities to re-think the way traffic is managed. This paper capitalizes on vehicle connectivity and proposes an economic instrument and corresponding cooperative framework for allocating priority at intersections. The framework is compatible with a variety of existing intersection control approaches. Similar to free markets, our framework allows vehicles to trade their time based on their (disclosed) value of time. We design the framework based on transferable utility games, where winners (time buyers) pay losers (time sellers) in each game. We conduct simulation experiments of both isolated intersections and an arterial setting. The results show that the proposed approach benefits the majority of users when compared to other mechanisms both ones that employ an economic instrument and ones that do not. We also show that it drives travelers to estimate their value of time correctly, and it naturally dissuades travelers from attempting to cheat.