BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Diana Staneva

Diana Staneva contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
cond-mat.mtrl-sciphysics.comp-phcond-mat.mes-hallnlin.AOnlin.PS

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
5topics
2close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2011arXiv

Hybrid Models of Step Bunching

We introduce two hybrid models of step bunching on vicinal crystal surfaces. The model equations for step velocity are constructed by the two possible exchanges of terms between the equations of two primary models MM2 and LW2 [arXiv:1011.1863], both showing the specific type of bunching with minimal step-step distance lmin in the bunch independent of the number of steps N in it. This feature is preserved only in the hybrid model LW2MM (the first term in the model equation comes from LW2 and the second one - from MM2) but in a rather complex fashion -- the surface slope is largest in the both ends of the bunch and after a sharp decrease jumps again to become constant in the inner part. We restrict our considerations to the simplest case of p = 0, p being the exponent in the destabilizing term in the velocity equations. The time-scaling exponent of N in LW2MM is ~1/3 and is independent of n, the exponent in the stabilizing term of the velocity equations. The other model, MM2LW, shows an interesting type of step bunching -- some bunches grow to a certain size and then decay emitting steps towards the two adjacent bunches. The bunch compression with the increase of N is pronounced.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

Models of step bunching: Turning repulsion into attraction

We report numerical results for two models of vicinal motion. The first, LW, aims at crystal evaporation when the detachment from steps is slow [Liu and Weeks, PRB 57, 23 (1998) 14891]. The source of destabilization is electromigration force acting on the adatoms. The destabilizing part of equation(s) of the step velocity is linear in the widths of the adjacent terraces with larger contribution of the terrace behind. This asymmetry is controlled by a single parameter b. The stabilization part accounts for the tendency to equidistant spacing dictated by the interstep repulsions. We construct the second model, LW2, from LW in the same manner as was constructed Minimal Model 2 (MM2) from another minimal model [B.Ranguelov et al., Nanoscience and Nanotechnology 6, (2006) 31] - keeping the 'repulsions term' from LW and introducing a similar one with opposite sign as 'attractions term'. For LW we obtain for first time that in the pre-factor of the time scaling of the number of steps in the bunch N enters only the parameter b. In LW2 we find the same type of step bunching as in MM2 - the surface slope in the bunch is constant and not function of N. Further, we obtain the time scaling of N with exponent ~0.18, found also in experiments, and the minimal distance in the bunch as function of the model parameters.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

Self-Organization on Unstable Vicinal Surfaces with Competing Interactions

Long-ranged step-step attractions destabilize the vicinal crystal surfaces. Their competition with shorter-ranged step-step repulsions results in self-organized patterns. The exponent in the time-scaling of their characteristic size is influenced only by the range of the attractions but not by the range of the repulsions as we show based on precise numerical analysis of two different minimal models. Another anisotropy we identify is that the vicinal surface is not destabilized by shorter-ranged attractions.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access