BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Detlef Plump

Detlef Plump contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Logic in Computer ScienceProgramming LanguagesData Structures and AlgorithmsSymbolic ComputationComputational ComplexityNeural and Evolutionary Computing

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
11works
0followers
6topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

11 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

Implementing Binary Search Trees in GP 2 (Extended Abstract)

We present an approach to implement binary search trees in the rule-based graph programming language GP 2. Our implementation uses GP 2's rooted graph transformation rules to be fast and supports insertion, deletion and query operations. We argue that the worst-case runtime for each of the operations is O(n) for a tree with n nodes. In addition, we expect that, on average, the operations run in time O(log(n)). Hence the implementation would match the time complexity of binary search trees implementations in imperative languages.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Confluence up to Garbage in Graph Transformation

The transformation of graphs and graph-like structures is ubiquitous in computer science. When a system is described by graph-transformation rules, it is often desirable that the rules are both terminating and confluent so that rule applications in an arbitrary order produce unique resulting graphs. However, there are application scenarios where the rules are not globally confluent but confluent on a subclass of graphs that are of interest. In other words, non-resolvable conflicts can only occur on graphs that are considered as "garbage". In this paper, we introduce the notion of confluence up to garbage and generalise Plump's critical pair lemma for double-pushout graph transformation, providing a sufficient condition for confluence up to garbage by non-garbage critical pair analysis. We apply our results in two case studies about efficient language recognition: we present backtracking-free graph reduction systems which recognise a class of flow diagrams and a class of labelled series-parallel graphs, respectively. Both systems are non-confluent but confluent up to garbage. We also give a critical pair condition for subcommutativity up to garbage which, together with closedness, implies confluence up to garbage even in non-terminating systems.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Efficient Recognition of Graph Languages

Graph transformation is the rule-based modification of graphs, and is a discipline dating back to the 1970s. In general, to match the left-hand graph of a fixed rule within a host graph requires polynomial time, but to improve matching performance, Dörr proposed to equip rules and host graphs with distinguished root nodes. This model was implemented by Plump and Bak, but unfortunately, such rules are not invertible. We address this problem by defining rootedness using a partial function into a two-point set rather than pointing graphs with root nodes, meaning derivations are natural double pushouts. Moreover, we give a sufficient condition on rules to give constant time rule application on graphs of bounded degree, and that, the graph class of trees can be recognised in linear time, given an input graph of bounded degree. Finally, we define a new notion of confluence up to garbage and non-garbage critical pairs, showing it is sufficient to require strong joinability of only the non-garbage critical pairs to establish confluence up to garbage. Finally, this new result, presented for conventional graph transformation systems, can be lifted to our rooted setting by encoding node labels and rootedness as looped edges.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Fast Rule-Based Graph Programs

Implementing graph algorithms efficiently in a rule-based language is challenging because graph pattern matching is expensive. In this paper, we present a number of linear-time implementations of graph algorithms in GP 2, an experimental programming language based on graph transformation rules which aims to facilitate program analysis and verification. We focus on two classes of rule-based graph programs: graph reduction programs which check some graph property, and programs using a depth-first search to test some property or perform an operation such as producing a 2-colouring or a topological sorting. Programs of the first type run in linear time without any constraints on input graphs while programs of the second type require input graphs of bounded degree to run in linear time. Essential for achieving the linear time complexity are so-called rooted rules in GP 2, which, in many situations, can be matched in constant time. For each of our programs, we prove both correctness and complexity, and also give empirical evidence for their run time.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Improving the GP 2 Compiler

GP 2 is an experimental programming language based on graph transformation rules which aims to facilitate program analysis and verification. Writing efficient programs in such a language is hard because graph matching is expensive, however GP 2 addresses this problem by providing rooted rules which, under mild conditions, can be matched in constant time using the GP 2 to C compiler. In this report, we document various improvements made to the compiler; most notably the introduction of node lists to improve iteration performance for destructive programs, meaning that binary DAG recognition by reduction need only take linear time where the previous implementation required quadratic time.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

The Improved GP 2 Compiler

GP 2 is a rule-based programming language based on graph transformation rules which aims to facilitate program analysis and verification. Writing efficient programs in such a language is challenging because graph matching is expensive. GP 2 addresses this problem by providing rooted rules which, under mild conditions, can be matched in constant time. Recently, we implemented a number of changes to Bak's GP 2-to-C compiler in order to speed up graph programs. One key improvement is a new data structure for dynamic arrays called BigArray. This is an array of pointers to arrays of entries, successively doubling in size. To demonstrate the speed-up achievable with the new implementation, we present a reduction program for recognising binary DAGs which previously ran in quadratic time but now runs in linear time when compiled with the new compiler.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Evolving Graphs with Semantic Neutral Drift

We introduce the concept of Semantic Neutral Drift (SND) for genetic programming (GP), where we exploit equivalence laws to design semantics preserving mutations guaranteed to preserve individuals' fitness scores. A number of digital circuit benchmark problems have been implemented with rule-based graph programs and empirically evaluated, demonstrating quantitative improvements in evolutionary performance. Analysis reveals that the benefits of the designed SND reside in more complex processes than simple growth of individuals, and that there are circumstances where it is beneficial to choose otherwise detrimental parameters for a GP system if that facilitates the inclusion of SND.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Verifying Monadic Second-Order Properties of Graph Programs

The core challenge in a Hoare- or Dijkstra-style proof system for graph programs is in defining a weakest liberal precondition construction with respect to a rule and a postcondition. Previous work addressing this has focused on assertion languages for first-order properties, which are unable to express important global properties of graphs such as acyclicity, connectedness, or existence of paths. In this paper, we extend the nested graph conditions of Habel, Pennemann, and Rensink to make them equivalently expressive to monadic second-order logic on graphs. We present a weakest liberal precondition construction for these assertions, and demonstrate its use in verifying non-local correctness specifications of graph programs in the sense of Habel et al.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Proceedings 7th International Workshop on Computing with Terms and Graphs

This volume contains the proceedings of the Seventh International Workshop on Computing with Terms and Graphs (TERMGRAPH 2013). The workshop took place in Rome, Italy, on March 23rd, 2013, as part of the sixteenth edition of the European Joint Conferences on Theory and Practice of Software (ETAPS 2013). Research in term and graph rewriting ranges from theoretical questions to practical issues. Computing with graphs handles the sharing of common subexpressions in a natural and seamless way, and improves the efficiency of computations in space and time. Sharing is ubiquitous in several research areas, as witnessed by the modelling of first- and higher-order term rewriting by (acyclic or cyclic) graph rewriting, the modelling of biological or chemical abstract machines, and the implementation techniques of programming languages: many implementations of functional, logic, object-oriented, concurrent and mobile calculi are based on term graphs. Term graphs are also used in automated theorem proving and symbolic computation systems working on shared structures. The aim of this workshop is to bring together researchers working in different domains on term and graph transformation and to foster their interaction, to provide a forum for presenting new ideas and work in progress, and to enable newcomers to learn about current activities in term graph rewriting. These proceedings contain six accepted papers and the abstracts of two invited talks. All submissions were subject to careful refereeing. The topics of accepted papers range over a wide spectrum, including theoretical aspects of term graph rewriting, concurrency, semantics as well as application issues of term graph transformation.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

The Design of GP 2

This papers defines the syntax and semantics of GP 2, a revised version of the graph programming language GP. New concepts are illustrated and explained with example programs. Changes to the first version of GP include an improved type system for labels, a built-in marking mechanism for nodes and edges, a more powerful edge predicate for conditional rule schemata, and functions returning the indegree and outdegree of matched nodes. Moreover, the semantics of the branching and loop statement have been simplified to allow their efficient implementation.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

The Semantics of Graph Programs

GP (for Graph Programs) is a rule-based, nondeterministic programming language for solving graph problems at a high level of abstraction, freeing programmers from handling low-level data structures. The core of GP consists of four constructs: single-step application of a set of conditional graph-transformation rules, sequential composition, branching and iteration. We present a formal semantics for GP in the style of structural operational semantics. A special feature of our semantics is the use of finitely failing programs to define GP's powerful branching and iteration commands.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access