Source author record

Dennis L. Goeckel

Dennis L. Goeckel appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

2works
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

Asymptotic Privacy Loss due to Time Series Matching of Dependent Users

The Internet of Things (IoT) promises to improve user utility by tuning applications to user behavior, but revealing the characteristics of a user's behavior presents a significant privacy risk. Our previous work has established the challenging requirements for anonymization to protect users' privacy in a Bayesian setting in which we assume a powerful adversary who has perfect knowledge of the prior distribution for each user's behavior. However, even sophisticated adversaries do not often have such perfect knowledge; hence, in this paper, we turn our attention to an adversary who must learn user behavior from past data traces of limited length. We also assume there exists dependency between data traces of different users, and the data points of each user are drawn from a normal distribution. Results on the lengths of training sequences and data sequences that result in a loss of user privacy are presented.

preprint2014arXiv

Performance Bounds for Grouped Incoherent Measurements in Compressive Sensing

Compressive sensing (CS) allows for acquisition of sparse signals at sampling rates significantly lower than the Nyquist rate required for bandlimited signals. Recovery guarantees for CS are generally derived based on the assumption that measurement projections are selected independently at random. However, for many practical signal acquisition applications, including medical imaging and remote sensing, this assumption is violated as the projections must be taken in groups. In this paper, we consider such applications and derive requirements on the number of measurements needed for successful recovery of signals when groups of dependent projections are taken at random. We find a penalty factor on the number of required measurements with respect to the standard CS scheme that employs conventional independent measurement selection and evaluate the accuracy of the predicted penalty through simulations.