BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Denis Pankratov

Denis Pankratov contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Data Structures and AlgorithmsComputational GeometryDiscrete Mathematics

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 19 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
5works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

5 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Advice Complexity of Adaptive Priority Algorithms

The priority model was introduced to capture "greedy-like" algorithms. Motivated by the success of advice complexity in the area of online algorithms, the fixed priority model was extended to include advice, and a reduction-based framework was developed for proving lower bounds on the amount of advice required to achieve certain approximation ratios in this rather powerful model. To capture most of the algorithms that are considered greedy-like, the even stronger model of adaptive priority algorithms is needed. We extend the adaptive priority model to include advice. We modify the reduction-based framework from the fixed priority case to work with the more powerful adaptive priority algorithms, simplifying the proof of correctness and strengthening all previous lower bounds by a factor of two in the process. We also present a purely combinatorial adaptive priority algorithm with advice for Minimum Vertex Cover on triangle-free graphs of maximum degree three. Our algorithm achieves optimality and uses at most 7n/22 bits of advice. No adaptive priority algorithm without advice can achieve optimality without advice, and we prove that an online algorithm with advice needs more than 7n/22 bits of advice to reach optimality. We show connections between exact algorithms and priority algorithms with advice. The branching in branch-and-reduce algorithms can be seen as trying all possible advice strings, and all priority algorithms with advice that achieve optimality define corresponding exact algorithms, priority exact algorithms. Lower bounds on advice-based adaptive algorithms imply lower bounds on running times of exact algorithms designed in this way.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Advice Complexity of Online Non-Crossing Matching

We study online matching in the Euclidean $2$-dimesional plane with non-crossing constraint. The offline version was introduced by Atallah in 1985 and the online version was introduced and studied more recently by Bose et al. The input to the problem consists of a sequence of points, and upon arrival of a point an algorithm can match it with a previously unmatched point provided that line segments corresponding to the matched edges do not intersect. The decisions are irrevocable, and while an optimal offline solution always matches all the points, an online algorithm cannot match all the points in the worst case, unless it is given some side information, i.e., advice. We study two versions of this problem -- monomchromatic (MNM) and bichromatic (BNM). We show that advice complexity of solving BNM optimally on a circle (or, more generally, on inputs in a convex position) is tightly bounded by the logarithm of the $n^\text{th}$ Catalan number from above and below. This result corrects the previous claim of Bose et al. that the advice complexity is $\log(n!)$. At the heart of the result is a connection between non-crossing constraint in online inputs and $231$-avoiding property of permutations of $n$ elements We also show a lower bound of $n/3-1$ and an upper bound of $3n$ on the advice complexity for MNM on a plane. This gives an exponential improvement over the previously best known lower bound and an improvement in the constant of the leading term in the upper bound. In addition, we establish a lower bound of $\fracα{2}\infdiv{\frac{2(1-α)}α}{1/4}n$ on the advice complexity for achieving competitive ratio $α$ for MNM on a circle. Standard tools from advice complexity, such as partition trees and reductions from string guessing problem, do not seem to apply to MNM/BNM, so we have to design our lower bounds from first principles.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Maximum Weight Convex Polytope

We study the maximum weight convex polytope problem, in which the goal is to find a convex polytope maximizing the total weight of enclosed points. Prior to this work, the only known result for this problem was an $O(n^3)$ algorithm for the case of $2$ dimensions due to Bautista et al. We show that the problem becomes $\mathcal{NP}$-hard to solve exactly in $3$ dimensions, and $\mathcal{NP}$-hard to approximate within $n^{1/2-ε}$ for any $ε> 0$ in $4$ or more dimensions. %\polyAPX-complete in $4$ dimensions even with binary weights. We also give a new algorithm for $2$ dimensions, albeit with the same $O(n^3)$ running time complexity as that of the algorithm of Bautsita et al.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Online Coloring and a New Type of Adversary for Online Graph Problems

We introduce a new type of adversary for online graph problems. The new adversary is parameterized by a single integer $κ$, which upper bounds the number of connected components that the adversary can use at any time during the presentation of the online graph $G$. We call this adversary "$κ$ components bounded", or $κ$-CB for short. On one hand, this adversary is restricted compared to the classical adversary because of the $κ$-CB constraint. On the other hand, we seek competitive ratios parameterized only by $κ$ with no dependence on the input length $n$, thereby giving the new adversary power to use arbitrarily large inputs. We study online coloring under the $κ$-CB adversary. We obtain finer analysis of the existing algorithms $FirstFit$ and $CBIP$ by computing their competitive ratios on trees and bipartite graphs under the new adversary. Surprisingly, $FirstFit$ outperforms $CBIP$ on trees. When it comes to bipartite graphs $FirstFit$ is no longer competitive under the new adversary, while $CBIP$ uses at most $2κ$ colors. We also study several well known classes of graphs, such as $3$-colorable, $C_k$-free, $d$-inductive, planar, and bounded treewidth, with respect to online coloring under the $κ$-CB adversary. We demonstrate that the extra adversarial power of unbounded input length outweighs the restriction on the number of connected components leading to non existence of competitive algorithms for these classes.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

The Bike Sharing Problem

Assume that $m \geq 1$ autonomous mobile agents and $0 \leq b \leq m$ single-agent transportation devices (called {\em bikes}) are initially placed at the left endpoint $0$ of the unit interval $[0,1]$. The agents are identical in capability and can move at speed one. The bikes cannot move on their own, but any agent riding bike $i$ can move at speed $v_i > 1$. An agent may ride at most one bike at a time. The agents can cooperate by sharing the bikes; an agent can ride a bike for a time, then drop it to be used by another agent, and possibly switch to a different bike. We study two problems. In the \BS problem, we require all agents and bikes starting at the left endpoint of the interval to reach the end of the interval as soon as possible. In the \RBS problem, we aim to minimize the arrival time of the agents; the bikes can be used to increase the average speed of the agents, but are not required to reach the end of the interval. Our main result is the construction of a polynomial time algorithm for the \BS problem that creates an arrival-time optimal schedule for travellers and bikes to travel across the interval. For the \RBS problem, we give an algorithm that gives an optimal solution for the case when at most one of the bikes can be abandoned.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access