BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Dengji Zhao

Dengji Zhao appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
Computer Science and Game TheoryArtificial Intelligenceecon.THSocial and Information Networks

Catalog footprint

What is connected

13works
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

13 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Multi-Unit Diffusion Auctions with Intermediaries

This paper studies multi-unit auctions powered by intermediaries, where each intermediary owns a private set of unit-demand buyers and all intermediaries are networked with each other. Our goal is to incentivize the intermediaries to diffuse the auction information to individuals they can reach, including their private buyers and neighboring intermediaries, so that more potential buyers are able to participate in the auction. To this end, we build a diffusion-based auction framework which incorporates the strategic interaction of intermediaries. It is showed that the classic Vickrey-Clarke-Groves (VCG) mechanism within the framework can achieve the maximum social welfare, but it may decrease the seller's revenue or even lead to a deficit. To overcome the revenue issue, we propose a novel auction, called critical neighborhood auction, which not only maximizes the social welfare, but also improves the seller's revenue comparing to the VCG mechanism with/without intermediaries.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Task Allocation on Networks with Execution Uncertainty

We study a single task allocation problem where each worker connects to some other workers to form a network and the task requester only connects to some of the workers. The goal is to design an allocation mechanism such that each worker is incentivized to invite her neighbours to join the allocation, although they are competing for the task. Moreover, the performance of each worker is uncertain, which is modelled as the quality level of her task execution. The literature has proposed solutions to tackle the uncertainty problem by paying them after verifying their execution. Here, we extend the problem to the network setting. The challenge is that the requester relies on the workers to invite each other to find the best worker, and the performance of each worker is also unknown to the task requester. In this paper, we propose a new mechanism to solve the two challenges at the same time. The mechanism guarantees that inviting more workers and reporting/performing according to her true ability is a dominant strategy for each worker. We believe that the new solution can be widely applied in the digital economy powered by social connections such as crowdsourcing and contests.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Incentives to Invite Others to Form Larger Coalitions

We study a cooperative game setting where the grand coalition may change since the initial players can invite more players. We focus on monotone games, i.e., adding more players to the grand coalition is not harmful. We model the invitation relationship as a directed acyclic graph. Our goal is to design a reward distribution mechanism for this new cooperative game setting such that players are incentivized to invite new players. In this paper, we propose the weighted permission Shapley value (inspired by permission structure and the weighted Shapley value) to achieve the goal. Our solution offers the very first attempt to incentivize players to invite more players to form a larger coalition via their private invitations in cooperative settings.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Mechanism Design Powered by Social Interactions

Mechanism design has traditionally assumed that the set of participants are fixed and known to the mechanism (the market owner) in advance. However, in practice, the market owner can only directly reach a small number of participants (her neighbours). Hence the owner often needs costly promotions to recruit more participants in order to get desirable outcomes such as social welfare or revenue maximization. In this paper, we propose to incentivize existing participants to invite their neighbours to attract more participants. However, they would not invite each other if they are competitors. We discuss how to utilize the conflict of interest between the participants to incentivize them to invite each other to form larger markets. We will highlight the early solutions and open the floor for discussing the fundamental open questions in the settings of auctions, coalitional games, matching and voting.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Collaborative Data Acquisition

We consider a requester who acquires a set of data (e.g. images) that is not owned by one party. In order to collect as many data as possible, crowdsourcing mechanisms have been widely used to seek help from the crowd. However, existing mechanisms rely on third-party platforms, and the workers from these platforms are not necessarily helpful and redundant data are also not properly handled. To combat this problem, we propose a novel crowdsourcing mechanism based on social networks, where the rewards of the workers are calculated by information entropy and a modified Shapley value. This mechanism incentivizes the workers from the network to not only provide all data they have but also further invite their neighbours to offer more data. Eventually, the mechanism is able to acquire all data from all workers on the network and the requester's cost is no more than the value of the data acquired. The experiments show that our mechanism outperforms traditional crowdsourcing mechanisms.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Incentive-Compatible Diffusion Auctions

Diffusion auction is a new model in auction design. It can incentivize the buyers who have already joined in the auction to further diffuse the sale information to others via social relations, whereby both the seller's revenue and the social welfare can be improved. Diffusion auctions are essentially non-typical multidimensional mechanism design problems and agents' social relations are complicatedly involved with their bids. In such auctions, incentive-compatibility (IC) means it is best for every agent to honestly report her valuation and fully diffuse the sale information to all her neighbors. Existing work identified some specific mechanisms for diffusion auctions, while a general theory characterizing all incentive-compatible diffusion auctions is still missing. In this work, we identify a sufficient and necessary condition for all dominant-strategy incentive-compatible (DSIC) diffusion auctions. We formulate the monotonic allocation policies in such multidimensional problems and show that any monotonic allocation policy can be implemented in a DSIC diffusion auction mechanism. Moreover, given any monotonic allocation policy, we obtain the optimal payment policy to maximize the seller's revenue.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Incentivize Diffusion with Fair Rewards

This paper studies a sale promotion mechanism design problem on a social network, where a node (a seller) sells one item to the other nodes on the network to maximize her revenue. However, the seller does not know other nodes except for her neighbours and her neighbours have no incentive to promote the sale. Hence, the goal is to design an auction mechanism such that the seller's neighbours are incentivized to invite their neighbours to join the auction, while the seller's revenue is guaranteed to increase. This is not achievable with traditional mechanisms. One solution has been proposed recently by carefully designing a reward scheme for the nodes who have invited others. However, the solution only gives rewards to some cut-points of the network, but cut-points rarely exist in a well-connected network, which actually disincentivizes nodes' participation. Therefore, we propose another novel mechanism to reward more related participants with fairer rewards, and the seller's revenue is not reduced.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Maximal Information Propagation with Budgets

In this paper, we present an information propagation game on a network where the information is originated from a sponsor who is willing to pay a fixed total budget to the players who propagate the information. Our solution can be applied to real world situations such as advertising via social networks with limited budgets. The goal is to design a mechanism to distribute the budget such that all players in the social network are incentivized to propagate information to all their neighbours. We propose a family of mechanisms to achieve the goal, where propagating information to all neighbours is a dominant strategy for all players. Furthermore, we also consider the cases where the budget has to be completely shared.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Redistribution Mechanism on Networks

Redistribution mechanisms have been proposed for more efficient resource allocation but not for profit. We consider redistribution mechanism design in a setting where participants are connected and the resource owner is only connected to some of them. In this setting, to make the resource allocation more efficient, the resource owner has to inform the others who are not her neighbours, but her neighbours do not want more participants to compete with them. Hence, the goal is to design a redistribution mechanism such that participants are incentivized to invite more participants and the resource owner does not earn or lose much money from the allocation. We first show that existing redistribution mechanisms cannot be directly applied in the network setting and prove the impossibility to achieve efficiency without a deficit. Then we propose a novel network-based redistribution mechanism such that all participants on the network are invited, the allocation is more efficient and the resource owner has no deficit.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Sybil-proof Answer Querying Mechanism

We study a question answering problem on a social network, where a requester is seeking an answer from the agents on the network. The goal is to design reward mechanisms to incentivize the agents to propagate the requester's query to their neighbours if they don't have the answer. Existing mechanisms are vulnerable to Sybil-attacks, i.e., an agent may get more reward by creating fake identities. Hence, we combat this problem by first proving some impossibility results to resolve Sybil-attacks and then characterizing a class of mechanisms which satisfy Sybil-proofness (prevents Sybil-attacks) as well as other desirable properties. Except for Sybil-proofness, we also consider cost minimization for the requester and agents' collusions.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Efficient Task Collaboration with Execution Uncertainty

We study a general task allocation problem, involving multiple agents that collaboratively accomplish tasks and where agents may fail to successfully complete the tasks assigned to them (known as execution uncertainty). The goal is to choose an allocation that maximises social welfare while taking their execution uncertainty into account. We show that this can be achieved by using the post-execution verification (PEV)-based mechanism if and only if agents' valuations satisfy a multilinearity condition. We then consider a more complex setting where an agent's execution uncertainty is not completely predictable by the agent alone but aggregated from all agents' private opinions (known as trust). We show that PEV-based mechanism with trust is still truthfully implementable if and only if the trust aggregation is multilinear.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Incentive Design for Ridesharing with Uncertainty

We consider a ridesharing problem where there is uncertainty about the completion of trips from both drivers and riders. Specifically, we study ridesharing mechanisms that aim to incentivize commuters to reveal their valuation for trips and their probability of undertaking their trips. Due to the interdependence created by the uncertainty on commuters' valuations, we show that the Groves mechanisms are not ex-post truthful even if there is only one commuter whose valuation depends on the other commuters' uncertainty of undertaking their trips. To circumvent this impossibility, we propose an ex-post truthful mechanism, the best incentive we can design without sacrificing social welfare in this setting. Our mechanism pays a commuter if she undertakes her trip, otherwise she is penalized for not undertaking her trip. Furthermore, we identify a sufficient and necessary condition under which our mechanism is ex-post truthful.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Decomposing Truthful and Competitive Online Double Auctions

In this paper, we study online double auctions, where multiple sellers and multiple buyers arrive and depart dynamically to exchange one commodity. We show that there is no deterministic online double auction that is truthful and competitive for maximising social welfare in an adversarial model. However, given the prior information that sellers are patient and the demand is not more than the supply, a deterministic and truthful greedy mechanism is actually 2-competitive, i.e. it guarantees that the social welfare of its allocation is at least half of the optimal one achievable offline. Moreover, if the number of incoming buyers is predictable, we demonstrate that an online double auction can be reduced to an online one-sided auction, and the truthfulness and competitiveness of the reduced online double auction follow that of the online one-sided auction. Notably, by using the reduction, we find a truthful mechanism that is almost 1-competitive, when buyers arrive randomly. Finally, we argue that these mechanisms also have a promising applicability in more general settings without assuming that sellers are patient, by decomposing a market into multiple sub-markets.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access