BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Dawn Nelson

Dawn Nelson appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
math.NTmath.COmath.PR

Catalog footprint

What is connected

4works
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2016arXiv

Legal Decompositions Arising from Non-positive Linear Recurrences

Zeckendorf's theorem states that any positive integer can be written uniquely as a sum of non-adjacent Fibonacci numbers; this result has been generalized to many recurrence relations, especially those arising from linear recurrences with leading term positive. We investigate legal decompositions arising from two new sequences: the $(s,b)$-Generacci sequence and the Fibonacci Quilt sequence. Both satisfy recurrence relations with leading term zero, and thus previous results and techniques do not apply. These sequences exhibit drastically different behavior. We show that the $(s,b)$-Generacci sequence leads to unique legal decompositions, whereas not only do we have non-unique legal decompositions with the Fibonacci Quilt sequence, we also have that in this case the average number of legal decompositions grows exponentially. Another interesting difference is that while in the $(s,b)$-Generacci case the greedy algorithm always leads to a legal decomposition, in the Fibonacci Quilt setting the greedy algorithm leads to a legal decomposition (approximately) 93\% of the time. In the $(s,b)$-Generacci case, we again have Gaussian behavior in the number of summands as well as for the Fibonacci Quilt sequence when we restrict to decompositions resulting from a modified greedy algorithm.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

New Behavior in Legal Decompositions Arising from Non-positive Linear Recurrences

Zeckendorf's theorem states every positive integer has a unique decomposition as a sum of non-adjacent Fibonacci numbers. This result has been generalized to many sequences $\{a_n\}$ arising from an integer positive linear recurrence, each of which has a corresponding notion of a legal decomposition. Previous work proved the number of summands in decompositions of $m \in [a_n, a_{n+1})$ becomes normally distributed as $n\to\infty$, and the individual gap measures associated to each $m$ converge to geometric random variables, when the leading coefficient in the recurrence is positive. We explore what happens when this assumption is removed in two special sequences. In one we regain all previous results, including unique decomposition; in the other the number of legal decompositions exponentially grows and the natural choice for the legal decomposition (the greedy algorithm) only works approximately 92.6\% of the time (though a slight modification always works). We find a connection between the two sequences, which explains why the distribution of the number of summands and gaps between summands behave the same in the two examples. In the course of our investigations we found a new perspective on dealing with roots of polynomials associated to the characteristic polynomials. This allows us to remove the need for the detailed technical analysis of their properties which greatly complicated the proofs of many earlier results in the subject, as well as handle new cases beyond the reach of existing techniques.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

On the Asymptotic Behavior of Variance of PLRS Decompositions

A positive linear recurrence sequence is of the form $H_{n+1} = c_1 H_n + \cdots + c_L H_{n+1-L}$ with each $c_i \ge 0$ and $c_1 c_L > 0$, with appropriately chosen initial conditions. There is a notion of a legal decomposition (roughly, given a sum of terms in the sequence we cannot use the recurrence relation to reduce it) such that every positive integer has a unique legal decomposition using terms in the sequence; this generalizes the Zeckendorf decomposition, which states any positive integer can be written uniquely as a sum of non-adjacent Fibonacci numbers. Previous work proved not only that a decomposition exists, but that the number of summands $K_n(m)$ in legal decompositions of $m \in [H_n, H_{n+1})$ converges to a Gaussian. Using partial fractions and generating functions it is easy to show the mean and variance grow linearly in $n$: $a n + b + o(1)$ and $C n + d + o(1)$, respectively; the difficulty is proving $a$ and $C$ are positive. Previous approaches relied on delicate analysis of polynomials related to the generating functions and characteristic polynomials, and is algebraically cumbersome. We introduce new, elementary techniques that bypass these issues. The key insight is to use induction and bootstrap bounds through conditional probability expansions to show the variance is unbounded, and hence $C > 0$ (the mean is handled easily through a simple counting argument).

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Generalizing Zeckendorf's Theorem: The Kentucky Sequence

By Zeckendorf's theorem, an equivalent definition of the Fibonacci sequence (appropriately normalized) is that it is the unique sequence of increasing integers such that every positive number can be written uniquely as a sum of non-adjacent elements; this is called a legal decomposition. Previous work examined the distribution of the number of summands and the spacings between them, in legal decompositions arising from the Fibonacci numbers and other linear recurrence relations with non-negative integral coefficients. Many of these results were restricted to the case where the first term in the defining recurrence was positive. We study a generalization of the Fibonacci numbers with a simple notion of legality which leads to a recurrence where the first term vanishes. We again have unique legal decompositions, Gaussian behavior in the number of summands, and geometric decay in the distribution of gaps.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access