Source author record

Davide Coco

Davide Coco appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

1works
1topics
1close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

1 published item(s)

preprint2023arXiv

Quantify how space mission influence geopolitical dynamics? A security and social policy approach

We present a computational method to quantify the geopolitical impact of a space mission, based on the national budget and data logs of previous missions, and evidencing how even if some missions succeed, they can bring negative effects to the sponsored country. The objective of this research is to study how the success (or failure) of a space mission can bring an economical and political benefit (or loss) to a country. By retrieving various data, including sentiment from #hashtags related to the considered space missions, national budgets for space exploration, and the reliability of space launch systems, from social networks, public institutions, and online repositories, we propose an equation to evaluate the geopolitical importance of a space mission for a particular country or space agency. The geopolitical equation can be used by public institutions or private companies to estimate the potential impact of a space mission on public opinion and international relationships, which can be either positive or negative, as even successful missions may negatively affect international relationships and negotiations with some countries and their partners. Also we combine the ideology of classic social policy with a security and space mission point of view, to enlighten cultural, institutional, and political limits in public spending decisions.