BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

David Umsonst

David Umsonst contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
eess.SYSystems and Controlmath.OC

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

A Bayesian Nash equilibrium-based moving target defense against stealthy sensor attacks

We present a moving target defense strategy to reduce the impact of stealthy sensor attacks on feedback systems. The defender periodically and randomly switches between thresholds from a discrete set to increase the uncertainty for the attacker and make stealthy attacks detectable. However, the defender does not know the exact goal of the attacker but only the prior of the possible attacker goals. Here, we model one period with a constant threshold as a Bayesian game and use the Bayesian Nash equilibrium concept to find the distribution for the choice of the threshold in that period, which takes the defender's uncertainty about the attacker into account. To obtain the equilibrium distribution, the defender minimizes its cost consisting of the cost for false alarms and the cost induced by the attack. We present a necessary and sufficient condition for the existence of a moving target defense and formulate a linear program to determine the moving target defense. Furthermore, we present a closed-form solution for the special case when the defender knows the attacker's goals. The results are numerically evaluated on a four-tank process.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Experimental evaluation of sensor attacks and defense mechanisms in feedback systems

In this work, we evaluate theoretical results on the feasibility of, the worst-case impact of, and defense mechanisms against a stealthy sensor attack in an experimental setup. We demonstrate that for a controller with stable dynamics the stealthy sensor attack is possible to conduct and the theoretical worst-case impact is close to the achieved practical one. However, although the attack should theoretically be possible when the controller has integral action, we show that the integral action slows the attacker down and the attacker is not able to remain stealthy if it has not perfect knowledge of the controller state. In addition to that, we investigate the effect of different anomaly detectors on the attack impact and conclude that the impact under detectors with internal dynamics is smaller. Finally, we use noise injection into the controller dynamics to unveil the otherwise stealthy attacks.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Finite sample guarantees for quantile estimation: An application to detector threshold tuning

In threshold-based anomaly detection, we want to tune the threshold of a detector to achieve an acceptable false alarm rate. However, tuning the threshold is often a non-trivial task due to unknown detector output distributions. A detector threshold that provides an acceptable false alarm rate is equivalent to a specific quantile of the detector output distribution. Therefore, we use quantile estimators based on order statistics to estimate the detector threshold. The estimation of quantiles from sample data has a more than a century long tradition and we provide three different distribution-free finite sample guarantees for a class of quantile estimators. The first is based on the Dworetzky-Kiefer-Wolfowitz inequality, the second utilizes the Vysochanskij-Petunin inequality, and the third is based on exact confidence intervals for a beta distribution. These guarantees are then compared and used in the detector threshold tuning problem. We use both simulated data as well as data obtained from an experimental setup with the Temperature Control Lab to validate the guarantees provided.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access