Researcher profile

David T Jones

David T Jones contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Biomolecules Quantitative Methods

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - Baseline

2works

0followers

2topics

4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

preprint2020arXiv

Near-complete protein structural modelling of the minimal genome

Protein tertiary structure prediction has improved dramatically in recent years. A considerable fraction of various proteomes can be modelled in the absence of structural templates. We ask whether our DMPfold method can model all the proteins without templates in the JCVI-syn3.0 minimal genome, which contains 438 proteins. We find that a useful tertiary structure annotation can be provided for all but 10 proteins. The models may help annotate function in cases where it is unknown, and provide coverage for 29 predicted protein-protein interactions which lacked monomer models. We also show that DMPfold performs well on proteins with structures released since initial publication. It is likely that the minimal genome will have complete structural coverage within a few years.

preprint2016arXiv

An expanded evaluation of protein function prediction methods shows an improvement in accuracy

Background: The increasing volume and variety of genotypic and phenotypic data is a major defining characteristic of modern biomedical sciences. At the same time, the limitations in technology for generating data and the inherently stochastic nature of biomolecular events have led to the discrepancy between the volume of data and the amount of knowledge gleaned from it. A major bottleneck in our ability to understand the molecular underpinnings of life is the assignment of function to biological macromolecules, especially proteins. While molecular experiments provide the most reliable annotation of proteins, their relatively low throughput and restricted purview have led to an increasing role for computational function prediction. However, accurately assessing methods for protein function prediction and tracking progress in the field remain challenging. Methodology: We have conducted the second Critical Assessment of Functional Annotation (CAFA), a timed challenge to assess computational methods that automatically assign protein function. One hundred twenty-six methods from 56 research groups were evaluated for their ability to predict biological functions using the Gene Ontology and gene-disease associations using the Human Phenotype Ontology on a set of 3,681 proteins from 18 species. CAFA2 featured significantly expanded analysis compared with CAFA1, with regards to data set size, variety, and assessment metrics. To review progress in the field, the analysis also compared the best methods participating in CAFA1 to those of CAFA2. Conclusions: The top performing methods in CAFA2 outperformed the best methods from CAFA1, demonstrating that computational function prediction is improving. This increased accuracy can be attributed to the combined effect of the growing number of experimental annotations and improved methods for function prediction.