BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

David Mortensen

David Mortensen contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Computation and LanguageMultiagent SystemsArtificial Intelligenceeess.AS

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

POWSM: A Phonetic Open Whisper-Style Speech Foundation Model

Recent advances in spoken language processing have led to substantial progress in phonetic tasks such as automatic speech recognition (ASR), phone recognition (PR), grapheme-to-phoneme conversion (G2P), and phoneme-to-grapheme conversion (P2G). Despite their conceptual similarity, these tasks have largely been studied in isolation, each relying on task-specific architectures and datasets. In this paper, we introduce POWSM (Phonetic Open Whisper-style Speech Model), the first unified framework capable of jointly performing multiple phone-related tasks. POWSM enables seamless conversion between audio, text (graphemes), and phones, opening up new possibilities for universal and low-resource speech processing. Our model outperforms or matches specialized PR models of similar size (Wav2Vec2Phoneme and ZIPA) while jointly supporting G2P, P2G, and ASR. Our training data, code and models are released to foster open science.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2026arXiv

ReaComp: Compiling LLM Reasoning into Symbolic Solvers for Efficient Program Synthesis

LLMs can solve program synthesis tasks but remain inefficient and unreliable on hard instances requiring large combinatorial search. Given a small set of reasoning traces, we use coding agents to compile them into reusable symbolic program synthesizers over constrained DSLs. The resulting solvers require no LLM calls at test time and are strong standalone systems: symbolic solver ensembles reach 91.3% accuracy on PBEBench-Lite and 84.7% on PBEBench-Hard, outperforming LLMs with test-time scaling for the latter by +16.3 percentage points at zero LLM inference cost. They also complement LLM search, improving PBEBench-Hard accuracy from 68.4% to 85.8% while reducing reported token usage by 78%, and raising SLR-Bench hard-tier accuracy from 34.4% to 58.0% in a neuro-symbolic hybrid setting. Compared to directly using coding agents as per-instance solvers, induced solvers are substantially more Pareto-efficient, amortizing a small one-time construction cost over many zero-token executions. Finally, most solvers transfer zero-shot to a real historical linguistics task - predicting sound changes in natural language data - reaching 80.1% accuracy under ensembling and recovering some plausible linguistic rules. Together, these results show that reasoning traces can be compiled into reusable symbolic solvers that solve many tasks directly, complement LLM inference on hard cases, and provide a scalable route to domain-general solver induction. We release code and data for reproducibility.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Modeling Emergent Lexicon Formation with a Self-Reinforcing Stochastic Process

We introduce FiLex, a self-reinforcing stochastic process which models finite lexicons in emergent language experiments. The central property of FiLex is that it is a self-reinforcing process, parallel to the intuition that the more a word is used in a language, the more its use will continue. As a theoretical model, FiLex serves as a way to both explain and predict the behavior of the emergent language system. We empirically test FiLex's ability to capture the relationship between the emergent language's hyperparameters and the lexicon's Shannon entropy.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Recommendations for Systematic Research on Emergent Language

Emergent language is unique among fields within the discipline of machine learning for its open-endedness, not obviously presenting well-defined problems to be solved. As a result, the current research in the field has largely been exploratory: focusing on establishing new problems, techniques, and phenomena. Yet after these problems have been established, subsequent progress requires research which can measurably demonstrate how it improves on prior approaches. This type of research is what we call systematic research; in this paper, we illustrate this mode of research specifically for emergent language. We first identify the overarching goals of emergent language research, categorizing them as either science or engineering. Using this distinction, we present core methodological elements of science and engineering, analyze their role in current emergent language research, and recommend how to apply these elements.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access