BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

David Moriña

David Moriña contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
ApplicationsMethodology

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Bayesian Synthetic Likelihood Estimation for Underreported Non-Stationary Time Series: Covid-19 Incidence in Spain

The problem of dealing with misreported data is very common in a wide range of contexts for different reasons. The current situation caused by the Covid-19 worldwide pandemic is a clear example, where the data provided by official sources were not always reliable due to data collection issues and to the high proportion of asymptomatic cases. In this work, we explore the performance of Bayesian Synthetic Likelihood to estimate the parameters of a model capable of dealing with misreported information and to reconstruct the most likely evolution of the phenomenon. The performance of the proposed methodology is evaluated through a comprehensive simulation study and illustrated by reconstructing the weekly Covid-19 incidence in each Spanish Autonomous Community in 2020.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Left-censored recurrent event analysis in epidemiological studies: a proposal when the number of previous episodes is unknown

Left censoring can occur with relative frequency when analysing recurrent events in epidemiological studies, especially observational ones. Concretely, the inclusion of individuals that were already at risk before the effective initiation in a cohort study, may cause the unawareness of prior episodes that have already been experienced, and this will easily lead to biased and inefficient estimates. The objective of this paper is to propose a statistical method that performs successfully in these circumstances. Our proposal is based on the use of models with specific baseline hazard, imputing the number of prior episodes when unknown, with a stratified model depending on whether the individual had or had not previously been at risk, and the use of a frailty term. The performance is examined in different scenarios through a comprehensive simulation study.The proposed method achieves notable performance even when the percentage of subjects at risk before the beginning of the follow-up is very elevated, with biases that are often under 10\% and coverages of around 95\%, sometimes somewhat conservative. If the baseline hazard is constant, it seems to be that the ``Gap Time'' approach is better; if it is not constant, the ``Counting Process'' seems to be a better choice. Because of the lack of knowledge of the prior episodes that have been experienced by a part (or all) of subjects, the use of common baseline methods is not advised. Our proposal seems to perform acceptably in the majority of the scenarios proposed, becoming an interesting alternative in this context.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Estimating the real burden of disease under a pandemic situation: The SARS-CoV2 case

The present paper introduces a new model used to study and analyse the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV2) epidemic-reported-data from Spain. This is a Hidden Markov Model whose hidden layer is a regeneration process with Poisson immigration, Po-INAR(1), together with a mechanism that allows the estimation of the under-reporting in non-stationary count time series. A novelty of the model is that the expectation of the innovations in the unobserved process is a time-dependent function defined in such a way that information about the spread of an epidemic, as modelled through a Susceptible-Infectious-Removed dynamical system, is incorporated into the model. In addition, the parameter controlling the intensity of the under-reporting is also made to vary with time to adjust to possible seasonality or trend in the data. Maximum likelihood methods are used to estimate the parameters of the model.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Regression-based imputation of explanatory discrete missing data

Imputation of missing values is a strategy for handling non-responses in surveys or data loss in measurement processes, which may be more effective than ignoring them. When the variable represents a count, the literature dealing with this issue is scarce. Likewise, if problems of over- or under-dispersion are observed, generalisations of the Poisson distribution are recommended for carrying out imputation. In order to assess the performance of various regression models in the imputation of a discrete variable compared to classical counting models, this work presents a comprehensive simulation study considering a variety of scenarios and real data. To do so we compared the results of estimations using only complete data, and using imputations based on the Poisson, negative binomial, Hermite, and COMPoisson distributions, and the ZIP and ZINB models for excesses of zeros. The results of this work reveal that the COMPoisson distribution provides in general better results in any dispersion scenario, especially when the amount of missing information is large. When the variable presenting missing values is a count, the most widely used method is to assume that a classical Poisson model is the best alternative to impute the missing counts; however, in real-life research this assumption is not always correct, and it is common to find count variables exhibiting overdispersion or underdispersion, for which the Poisson model is no longer the best to use in imputation. In several of the scenarios considered the performance of the methods analysed differs, something which indicates that it is important to analyse dispersion and the possible presence of excess zeros before deciding on the imputation method to use. The COMPoisson model performs well as it is flexible regarding the handling of counts with characteristics of over- and under-dispersion, as well as with equidispersion.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access