Researcher profile

David Meister

David Meister contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

eess.SY Systems and Control eess.SP

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 19 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author

5works

0followers

3topics

4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

preprint2025arXiv

Current trends and future directions in event-based control

The defining characteristic of event-based control is that feedback loops are only closed when indicated by a triggering condition that takes recent information about the system into account. This stands in contrast to periodic control where the feedback loop is closed periodically. Benefits of event-based control arise when sampling comes at a cost, which occurs, e.g., for Networked Control Systems or in other setups with resource constraints. A rapidly growing number of publications deals with event-based control. Nevertheless, some fundamental questions about event-based control are still unsolved. In this article, we provide an overview of current research trends in event-based control. We focus on results that aim for a better understanding of effects that occur in feedback loops with event-based control. Based on this summary, we identify important open directions for future research.

preprint2025arXiv

How improving performance may imply losing consistency in event-triggered consensus

Event-triggered control is often argued to lower the average triggering rate compared to time-triggered control while still achieving a desired control goal, e.g., the same performance level. However, this property, often called consistency, cannot be taken for granted and can be hard to analyze in many settings. In particular, the performance properties of decentralized event-triggered control schemes with respect to time-triggered control remain mostly unexplored. Therefore, in this paper, we examine these performance properties for a consensus problem considering single-integrator agent dynamics, a level-triggering rule, and a complete communication graph. We consider the long-term average quadratic deviation from consensus as a performance measure. For this setting, we show that enriching the information the local controllers use improves the performance of the consensus algorithm but renders a previously consistent event-triggered control scheme inconsistent. In addition, we do so while deploying optimal control inputs which we derive for both information cases and triggering schemes. With this insight, we can furthermore explain the relationship between two seemingly contrasting consistency results from the literature.

preprint2023arXiv

Performance implications of different $p$-norms in level-triggered sampling

This work studies the performance of an event-based control approach, namely level-triggered sampling, in a standard multidimensional single-integrator setup. We falsify a conjecture from the literature that the deployed $p$-norm in the triggering condition supposedly has no impact on the performance of the sampling scheme in that setting. In particular, we show for the considered setup that the usage of the maximum norm instead of the Euclidean norm induces a performance deterioration of level-triggered sampling for sufficiently large system dimensions, when compared to periodic control at the same sampling rate. Moreover, we investigate the performance for other $p$-norms in simulation and observe that it degrades with increasing $p$. In addition, our findings reveal the previously unknown role of the triggering rule in the cause of a recently discovered phenomenon: Previous work has shown for a single-integrator consensus setup that the commonly observed performance advantage of event-based control over periodic control can be lost in distributed settings with a cooperative control goal. In our work, we obtain similar results for a non-cooperative setting only by adjusting the norm in the level-triggered sampling scheme. We therefore demonstrate that the performance degradation found in the distributed setting originates from the triggering rule and not from the considered cooperative control goal.

preprint2022arXiv

Analysis of Time- versus Event-Triggered Consensus for a Single-Integrator Multi-Agent System

It is well known that the employed triggering scheme has great impact on the control performance when control loops operate under scarce communication resources. Various practical and simulative works have demonstrated the potential of event-triggered control to reduce communication while providing a similar performance level when compared to time-triggered control. For non-cooperative networked control systems, analytical performance comparisons of time- and event-triggered control support this finding under certain assumptions. While being well-studied in the non-cooperative setting, it remains unclear if and how the performance relationship of the triggering schemes is altered in a multi-agent system setup. To close this gap, in this paper, we consider a homogeneous single-integrator multi-agent consensus problem for which we compare the performance of time- and event-triggered control schemes analytically. Under the assumption of equal average triggering rates, we use the long-term average of the quadratic deviation from consensus as a performance measure to contrast the triggering schemes. Contrary to the non-cooperative setting, we prove that event-triggered control performs worse than time-triggered control beyond a certain number of agents in this setup. In addition, we derive the asymptotic order of the performance measure as a function of the number of agents under both triggering schemes.

preprint2020arXiv

A Track-Before-Detect Approach to Multi-Target Tracking on Automotive Radar Sensor Data

In recent years, Bayes filter methods in the labeled random finite set formulation have become increasingly powerful in the multi-target tracking domain. One of the latest outcomes is the Generalized Labeled Multi-Bernoulli (GLMB) filter which allows for stable cardinality and target state estimation as well as target identification in a unified framework. In contrast to the initial context of the GLMB filter, this paper makes use of it in the Track-Before-Detect (TBD) scheme and thus, avoids information loss due to thresholding and other data preprocessing steps. This paper provides a TBD GLMB filter design under the separable likelihood assumption that can be applied to real world scenarios and data in the automotive radar context. Its applicability to real sensor data is demonstrated in an exemplary scenario. To the best of the authors' knowledge, the GLMB filter is applied to real radar data in a TBD framework for the first time.

Institution

Affiliation not imported yet

This author record came from a source that does not expose affiliation metadata. Once the author claims the profile or we enrich the record from another provider, this section will link to the concrete institution.

Topic footprint