BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for researchSource author record
David J. Saltman appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.
Catalog footprint
Research graph
Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.
BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.
Published work
G. Prasad and A. Rapinchuk asked if two quaternion division F -algebras that have the same subfields are necessarily isomorphic. The answer is known to be "no" for some very large fields. We prove that the answer is "yes" if F is an extension of a global field K so that F /K is unirational and has zero unramified Brauer group. We also prove a similar result for Pfister forms and give an application to tractable fields.
The centers of the generic central simple algebras with involution are interesting objects in the theory of central simple algebras. These fields also arise as invariant fields for linear actions of projective orthogonal or symplectic groups. In this paper, we prove that when the characteristic is not 2, these fields are retract rational, in the case the degree is $8m$ and $m$ is odd. We achieve this by proving the equivalent lifting property for the class of central simple algebras of degree $8m$ with involution. A companion paper ([S3]) deals with the case of $m$, $2m$ and $4m$ where stronger rationality results are proven.
The projective orthogonal and symplectic groups $PO_n(F)$ and $PSp_n(F)$ have a natural action on the $F$ vector space $V' = M_n(F) \oplus ... \oplus M_n(F)$. Here we assume $F$ is an infinite field of characteristic not 2. If we assume there is more than one summand in $V'$, then the invariant fields $F(V')^{PO_n}$ and $F(V')^{PSp_n}$ are natural objects. They are, for example, the centers of generic algebras with the appropriate kind of involution. This paper considers the rationality properties of these fields, in the case $1,2$ or 4 are the highest powers of 2 that divide $n$. We derive rationality when $n$ is odd, or when 2 is the highest power, and stable rationality when 4 is the highest power. In a companion paper [ST] joint with Tignol, we prove retract rationality when 8 is the highest power of 2 dividing $n$. Back in this paper, along the way, we consider two generic ways of forcing a Brauer class to be in the image of restriction.