Finite u Invariant and Bounds on Cohomology Symbol Lengths
In this note we answer a question of Parimala's, showing that fields with finite $u$ invariant have bounds on the symbol lengths in their $μ_2$ cohomology in all degrees.
Discover
Workspaces
Network
Opportunities
Account
Researcher profile
David J Saltman contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.
Trust snapshot
Actions
Identity and collaboration
Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.
Log in to claimDirect collaboration
Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.
Research graph
Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.
BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.
Published work
In this note we answer a question of Parimala's, showing that fields with finite $u$ invariant have bounds on the symbol lengths in their $μ_2$ cohomology in all degrees.
This paper began as an investigation of the question of whether $D_1 \otimes_F D_2$ is a domain where the $D_i$ are division algebras and $F$ is an algebraically closed field contained in their centers. We present an example where the answer is "no", and also study the Picard group and Brauer group properties of $F_1 \otimes_F F_2$ where the $F_i$ are fields. Finally, as part of our example, we have results about division algebras and Brauer groups over curves. Specifically, we give a splitting criterion for certain Brauer group elements on the product of two curves over $F$.
A celebrated theorem of P.M.Cohn says that for any two division rings (not necessarily finite dimensional) over a field F, their amalgamated product over F is a domain which can be embedded in a division ring. Note that even with the two initial division rings begin finite dimensional over their centers, the resulting division ring is never finite dimensional over its center. Perhaps this led Lance Small to ask the following question. Assume $F_1$ and $F_2$ are fields with the same characteristic. Small asked whether any two division algebras $D_1/F_1$ and $D_2/F_2$ can be embedded in some third division algebra $E/F$. We start with a surprisingly straightforward counterexample, but then show that a positive solution exists for division algebras finitely generated over a common subfield which is either algebraically closed or the prime subfield.