Researcher profile

David Cariolaro

David Cariolaro contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
2topics
3close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2014arXiv

Group Testing with Pools of Fixed Size

In the classical combinatorial (adaptive) group testing problem, one is given two integers \(d\) and \(n\), where \(0\le d\le n\), and a population of \(n\) items, exactly \(d\) of which are known to be defective. The question is to devise an optimal sequential algorithm that, at each step, tests a subset of the population and determines whether such subset is contaminated (i.e. contains defective items) or otherwise. The problem is solved only when the \(d\) defective items are identified. The minimum number of steps that an optimal sequential algorithm takes in general (i.e. in the worst case) to solve the problem is denoted by \(M(d, n)\). The computation of \(M(d, n)\) appears to be very difficult and a general formula is known only for \(d = 1\). We consider here a variant of the original problem, where the size of the subsets to be tested is restricted to be a fixed positive integer \(k\). The corresponding minimum number of tests by a sequential optimal algorithm is denoted by \(M^{\lbrack k\rbrack}(d, n)\). In this paper we start the investigation of the function \(M^{\lbrack k\rbrack}(d, n)\).

preprint2013arXiv

Excessive [l,m]-factorizations

Given two positive integers l and m, with l \le m, an [l,m]-covering of a graph G is a set M of matchings of G whose union is the edge set of G and such that l \le |L| \le m for every matching L of M. An [l,m]-covering M of G is an excessive [l,m]-factorization of G if the cardinality of M is as small as possible. The number of matchings in an excessive [l,m]-factorization of G (or \infty, if G does not admit an excessive [l,m]-factorization) is a graph parameter called the excessive [l,m]-index of G and denoted by χ'[l,m](G). In this paper we study such parameter. Our main result is a general formula for the excessive [l,m]-index of a graph G in terms of other graph parameters. Furthermore, we give a polynomial time algorithm which computes χ'[l,m](G) and outputs an excessive [l,m]-factorization of G, whenever the latter exists.