BZPEER
More

Discover

About BZPEERSearchGraph

Research tools

HomeCollectionsResearchCollaborationPublish

Network

ExpertsCommunities

Opportunities

Listings

Account

Log inCreate account
Log inCreate account

Source author record

David Camarena

Explore this author’s publications, collaborators and research topics. This catalog record has not been claimed by its author.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
astro-ph.COgr-qchep-phhep-th

Catalog footprint

Research overview

7works
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Is this your work?

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse papers

Published work

7 publications

preprint2026arXiv

Limits of self-interacting neutrinos from the BAO and CMB phase shift

Neutrinos with Standard Model interactions free-stream in the early Universe, leaving a distinct phase shift in the pattern of baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO). When isolated, this phase shift allows one to robustly infer the presence of the cosmic neutrino background in BAO and cosmic microwave background (CMB) data independently of other cosmological parameters. While in the context of the Standard Model, this phase shift follows a known scale-dependent relation, new physics in the cosmic neutrino background could alter the overall shape of this feature. In this paper, we discuss how changes in the neutrino phase shift could be used to constrain self-interactions among neutrinos. We produce simple models for this phase-shift assuming universal self-interactions, and use these in order to understand what constraining power is available for the strength of such interactions in BAO and CMB data. We find that, although challenging, it may be possible to use a detection of the phase to put a more robust limit on the strength of the self-interaction, GeffG_{\mathrm{eff}}, which at present suffers from bimodality in cosmological constraints. Our forecast analysis reveals that BAO data alone will not provide the precision needed to tightly constrain self-interactions; however, the combined analysis of the phase shift signature in both CMB and BAO can potentially provide a way to detect the impact of new neutrino interactions. Our results could be extended upon for models with non-universal interactions.

Open access
preprint2022arXiv

A void in the Hubble tension? The end of the line for the Hubble bubble

The Universe may feature large-scale inhomogeneities beyond the standard paradigm, implying that statistical homogeneity and isotropy may be reached only on much larger scales than the usually assumed ∼\sim100 Mpc. This means that we are not necessarily typical observers and that the Copernican principle could be recovered only on super-Hubble scales. Here, we do not assume the validity of the Copernican principle and let Cosmic Microwave Background, Baryon Acoustic Oscillations, type Ia supernovae, local H0H_0, cosmic chronometers, Compton y-distortion and kinetic Sunyaev-Zeldovich observations constrain the geometrical degrees of freedom of the local structure, which we parametrize via the ΛΛLTB model -- basically a non-linear radial perturbation of a FLRW metric. In order to quantify if a non-Copernican structure could explain away the Hubble tension, we pay careful attention to computing the Hubble constant in an inhomogeneous universe, and we adopt model selection via both the Bayes factor and the Akaike information criterion. Our results show that, while the ΛΛLTB model can successfully explain away the H0H_0 tension, it is favored with respect to the ΛΛCDM model only if one solely considers supernovae in the redshift range that is used to fit the Hubble constant, that is, 0.023<z<0.150.023<z<0.15. If one considers all the supernova sample, then the H0H_0 tension is not solved and the support for the ΛΛLTB model vanishes. Combined with other data sets, this solution to the Hubble tension barely helps. Finally, we have reconstructed our local spacetime. We have found that data are best fit by a shallow void with δL≈−0.04δ_L \approx -0.04 and rLout≈300r^{\mathrm{out}}_L \approx 300 Mpc, which, interestingly, lies on the border of the 95\% credible region relative to the standard model expectation.

Open access
preprint2022arXiv

Cosmology Intertwined: A Review of the Particle Physics, Astrophysics, and Cosmology Associated with the Cosmological Tensions and Anomalies

In this paper we will list a few important goals that need to be addressed in the next decade, also taking into account the current discordances between the different cosmological probes, such as the disagreement in the value of the Hubble constant H0H_0, the σ8σ_8--S8S_8 tension, and other less statistically significant anomalies. While these discordances can still be in part the result of systematic errors, their persistence after several years of accurate analysis strongly hints at cracks in the standard cosmological scenario and the necessity for new physics or generalisations beyond the standard model. In this paper, we focus on the 5.0 σ5.0\,σ tension between the {\it Planck} CMB estimate of the Hubble constant H0H_0 and the SH0ES collaboration measurements. After showing the H0H_0 evaluations made from different teams using different methods and geometric calibrations, we list a few interesting new physics models that could alleviate this tension and discuss how the next decade's experiments will be crucial. Moreover, we focus on the tension of the {\it Planck} CMB data with weak lensing measurements and redshift surveys, about the value of the matter energy density ΩmΩ_m, and the amplitude or rate of the growth of structure (σ8,fσ8σ_8,fσ_8). We list a few interesting models proposed for alleviating this tension, and we discuss the importance of trying to fit a full array of data with a single model and not just one parameter at a time. Additionally, we present a wide range of other less discussed anomalies at a statistical significance level lower than the H0H_0--S8S_8 tensions which may also constitute hints towards new physics, and we discuss possible generic theoretical approaches that can collectively explain the non-standard nature of these signals.[Abridged]

Open access
preprint2022arXiv

Late-transition vs smooth H(z)H(z) deformation models for the resolution of the Hubble crisis

Gravitational transitions at low redshifts (zt<0.1z_t<0.1) have been recently proposed as a solution to the Hubble and growth tensions. Such transitions would naturally lead to a transition in the absolute magnitude MM of type Ia supernovae (SnIa) at ztz_t (Late MM Transitions - LMTLMT) and possibly in the dark energy equation of state parameter ww (Late w−Mw-M Transitions - LwMTLwMT). Here, we compare the quality of fit to cosmological data of this class of models, with the corresponding quality of fit of the cosmological constant model (ΛΛCDM) and some of the best smooth H(z)H(z) deformation models (wwCDM, CPL, PEDE). We also perform model selection via the Akaike Information Criterion and the Bayes factor. We use the full CMB temperature anisotropy spectrum data, the baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO) data, the Pantheon SnIa data, the SnIa absolute magnitude MM as determined by Cepheid calibrators and the value of the Hubble constant H0H_0 as determined by local SnIa calibrated using Cepheids. We find that smooth H(z)H(z) deformation models perform worse than transition models for the following reasons: 1) They have a worse fit to low-zz geometric probes (BAO and SnIa data); 2) They favor values of the SnIa absolute magnitude MM that are lower as compared to the value McM_c obtained with local Cepheid calibrators at z<0.01z<0.01; 3) They tend to worsen the Ωm,0−σ8,0Ω_\mathrm{m,0}-σ_\mathrm{8,0} growth tension. We also find that the w−Mw-M transition model (LwMTLwMT) does not provide a better quality of fit to cosmological data than a pure MM transition model (LMTLMT) where ww is fixed to the \lcdm value w=−1w=-1 at all redshifts. We conclude that the LMTLMT model has significant statistical advantages over smooth late-time H(z)H(z) deformation models in addressing the Hubble crisis.

Open access
preprint2020arXiv

A new method to build the (inverse) distance ladder

The cosmic distance ladder is the succession of techniques by which it is possible to determine distances to astronomical objects. Here, we present a new method to build the cosmic distance ladder, going from local astrophysical measurements to the CMB. Instead of relying on high-redshift cosmography in order to model the luminosity-distance relation and calibrate supernovae with BAO, we exploit directly the distance-duality relation dL=(1+z)2dAd_L = (1+z)^2 d_A---valid if photon number is conserved and gravity is described by a metric theory. The advantage is that the results will not depend on the parametrization of the luminosity-distance relation at z>0.15z>0.15: no model is adopted in order to calibrate BAO with supernovae. This method yields local measurements of the Hubble constant and deceleration parameter. Furthermore, it can directly assess the impact of BAO observations on the strong 4--5σσ tension between local and global H0H_0. Using the latest supernova, BAO and CMB observations, we found a consistently low value of q0q_0 and strong inconsistency between angular-only BAO constraints and anisotropic BAO measurements, which are, or not, in agreement with CMB depending on the kind of analysis (see Table~44). We conclude that, in order to understand the reasons behind the H0H_0 crisis, a first step should be clarifying the tension between angular and perpendicular anisotropic BAO as this will help understanding if new physics is required at the pre-recombination epoch or/and during the dark energy era.

Open access
preprint2019arXiv

Local determination of the Hubble constant and the deceleration parameter

The determination of the Hubble constant H0H_0 from the Cosmic Microwave Background by the Planck Collaboration [Aghanim et al. 2018] is in tension at 4.2σ4.2σ with respect to the local determination of H0H_0 by the SH0ES collaboration [Reid et al. 2019]. Here, we improve upon the local determination, which fixes the deceleration parameter to the standard ΛΛCDM model value of q0=−0.55q_0=-0.55, that is, uses information from observations beyond the local universe. First, we derive the effective calibration prior on the absolute magnitude MBM_B of Supernovae Ia, which can be used in cosmological analyses in order to avoid the double counting of low-redshift supernovae. We find MB=−19.2334±0.0404M_B = -19.2334 \pm 0.0404 mag. Then, we use the above MBM_B prior in order to obtain a determination of the local H0H_0 which only uses local observations and only assumes the cosmological principle, that is, large-scale homogeneity and isotropy. This is achieved by adopting an uninformative flat prior for q0q_0 in the cosmographic expansion of the luminosity distance. We use the latest Pantheon sample and find H0=75.35±1.68 km s−1Mpc−1H_0= 75.35 \pm 1.68 \text{ km s}^{-1} {\rm Mpc}^{-1}, which features a 2.2% uncertainty, close to the 1.9% error obtained by the SH0ES Collaboration. Our determination is at the higher tension of 4.5σ4.5σ with the latest results from the Planck Collaboration that assume the ΛΛCDM model. Furthermore, we also constrain the deceleration parameter to q0=−1.08±0.29q_0= -1.08 \pm 0.29, which disagrees with Planck at the 1.9σ1.9σ level. These estimations only use supernovae in the redshift range 0.023≤z≤0.150.023\le z\le 0.15.

Open access
preprint2016arXiv

Cosmological constraints on the radiation released during structure formation

During the process of structure formation in the universe matter is converted into radiation through a variety of processes such as light from stars, infrared radiation from cosmic dust and gravitational waves from binary black holes/neutron stars and supernova explosions. The production of this astrophysical radiation background (ARB) could affect the expansion rate of the universe and the growth of perturbations. Here, we aim at understanding to which level one can constraint the ARB using future cosmological observations. We model the energy transfer from matter to radiation through an effective interaction between matter and astrophysical radiation. Using future supernova data from LSST and growth-rate data from Euclid we find that the ARB density parameter is constrained, at the 95% confidence level, to be Ωar0<0.008Ω_{ar_0}<0.008. Estimates of the energy density produced by well-known astrophysical processes give roughly Ωar0∼10−5Ω_{ar_0}\sim 10^{-5}. Therefore, we conclude that cosmological observations will only be able to constrain exotic or not-well understood sources of radiation.

Open access

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.