Source author record

David Bensaïd

David Bensaïd appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

1works
2topics
2close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

1 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Partial Shape Similarity via Alignment of Multi-Metric Hamiltonian Spectra

Evaluating the similarity of non-rigid shapes with significant partiality is a fundamental task in numerous computer vision applications. Here, we propose a novel axiomatic method to match similar regions across shapes. Matching similar regions is formulated as the alignment of the spectra of operators closely related to the Laplace-Beltrami operator (LBO). The main novelty of the proposed approach is the consideration of differential operators defined on a manifold with multiple metrics. The choice of a metric relates to fundamental shape properties while considering the same manifold under different metrics can thus be viewed as analyzing the underlying manifold from different perspectives. Specifically, we examine the scale-invariant metric and the corresponding scale-invariant Laplace-Beltrami operator (SI-LBO) along with the regular metric and the regular LBO. We demonstrate that the scale-invariant metric emphasizes the locations of important semantic features in articulated shapes. A truncated spectrum of the SI-LBO consequently better captures locally curved regions and complements the global information encapsulated in the truncated spectrum of the regular LBO. We show that matching these dual spectra outperforms competing axiomatic frameworks when tested on standard benchmarks. We introduced a new dataset and compare the proposed method with the state-of-the-art learning based approach in a cross-database configuration. Specifically, we show that, when trained on one data set and tested on another, the proposed axiomatic approach which does not involve training, outperforms the deep learning alternative.