Researcher profile

Daniel Werner

Daniel Werner contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

On the Chromatic Number of some generalized Kneser Graphs

We determine the chromatic number of the Kneser graph qΓ_{7,{3,4}} of flags of vectorial type {3, 4} of a rank 7 vector space over the finite field GF(q) for large q and describe the colorings that attain the bound. This result relies heavily, not only on the independence number, but also on the structure of all large independent sets. Furthermore, our proof is more general in the following sense: it provides the chromatic number of the Kneser graphs qΓ_{2d+1,{d,d+1}} of flags of vectorial type {d, d+1} of a rank 2d+1 vector space over GF(q) for large q as long as the large independent sets of the graphs are only the ones that are known.

preprint2020arXiv

Approximating Tverberg Points in Linear Time for Any Fixed Dimension

Let P be a d-dimensional n-point set. A Tverberg-partition of P is a partition of P into r sets P_1, ..., P_r such that the convex hulls conv(P_1), ..., conv(P_r) have non-empty intersection. A point in the intersection of the conv(P_i)'s is called a Tverberg point of depth r for P. A classic result by Tverberg implies that there always exists a Tverberg partition of size n/(d+1), but it is not known how to find such a partition in polynomial time. Therefore, approximate solutions are of interest. We describe a deterministic algorithm that finds a Tverberg partition of size n/4(d+1)^3 in time d^{O(log d)} n. This means that for every fixed dimension we can compute an approximate Tverberg point (and hence also an approximate centerpoint) in linear time. Our algorithm is obtained by combining a novel lifting approach with a recent result by Miller and Sheehy (2010).

preprint2010arXiv

Polynomial Bounds on the Slicing Number

NOTE: Unfortunately, most of the results mentioned here were already known under the name of "d-separated interval piercing". The result that T_d(m) exists was first proved by Gyaŕfaś and Lehel in 1970, see [5]. Later, the result was strengthened by Kaŕolyi and Tardos [9] to match our result. Moreover, their proof (in a different notation, of course) uses ideas very similar to ours and leads to a similar recurrence. Also, our conjecture turns out to be right and was proved for the 2-dimensional case by Tardos and for the general case by Kaiser [8]. An excellent survey article ("Transversals of d-intervals') is available on http://www.renyi.hu/~tardos. Still, we leave this paper available to the public on http://page.mi.fu-berlin.de/dawerner, also because one might find the references useful. ----- We study the following Gallai-type of problem: Assume that we are given a family X of convex objects in R^d such that among any subset of size m, there is an axis-parallel hyperplane intersecting at least two of the objects. What can we say about the number of axis-parallel hyperplanes that sufficient to intersect all sets in the family? In this paper, we show that this number T_d(m) exists, i.e., depends only on m and the dimension d, but not on the size of the set X. First, we derive a very weak super-exponential bound. Using this result, by a simple proof we are able to show that this number is even polynomially bounded for any fixed d. We partly answer open problem 74 on http://maven.smith.edu/~orourke/TOPP/, where the planar case is considered, by improving the best known exponential bound to O(m^2).