Source author record

Daniel M. Gordon

Explore this author’s publications, collaborators and research topics. This catalog record has not been claimed by its author.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

math.CO math.NT

Catalog footprint

Research overview

3works

2topics

1close collaborators

Actions

Is this your work?

Open graph Browse papers

preprint2020arXiv

On difference sets with small $λ$

In a 1989 paper \cite{arasu2}, Arasu used an observation about multipliers to show that no $(352,27,2)$ difference set exists in any abelian group. The proof is quite short and required no computer assistance. We show that it may be applied to a wide range of parameters $(v,k,λ)$ , particularly for small values of $λ$ . With it a computer search was able to show that the Prime Power Conjecture is true up to order $2 \cdot 10^{10}$ , extend Hughes and Dickey's computations for $λ=2$ and $k \leq 5000$ up to $10^{10}$ , and show nonexistence for many other parameters.

preprint2010arXiv

On the Density of the Set of Known Hadamard Orders

Let $S(x)$ be the number of $n \leq x$ for which a Hadamard matrix of order $n$ exists. Hadamard's conjecture states that $S(x)$ is about $x/4$ . From Paley's constructions of Hadamard matrices, we have that $S(x) = Ω(x/\log x).$ In a recent paper, the first author suggested that counting the products of orders of Paley matrices would result in a greater density. In this paper we use results of Kevin Ford to show that it does: \begin{equation}\label{eq:abs} S(x) \geq x/\log x \exp((C+o(1))(\log \log \log x)^2)\,, \nonumber \end{equation} where $C=0.8178...$ . This bound is surprisingly hard to improve upon. We show that taking into account all the other major known construction methods for Hadamard matrices does not shift the bound. Our arguments use the notion of a (multiplicative) monoid of natural numbers. We prove some initial results concerning these objects. Our techniques may be useful when assessing the status of other existence questions in design theory.

preprint2006arXiv

Perfect single error-correcting codes in the Johnson Scheme

Delsarte conjectured in 1973 that there are no nontrivial pefect codes in the Johnson scheme. Etzion and Schwartz recently showed that perfect codes must be k-regular for large k, and used this to show that there are no perfect codes correcting single errors in J(n,w) for n <= 50000. In this paper we show that there are no perfect single error-correcting codes for n <= 2^250.

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Daniel M. Gordon

Research overview

Is this your work?

3 publications

On difference sets with small $λ$

On the Density of the Set of Known Hadamard Orders

Perfect single error-correcting codes in the Johnson Scheme

See the researcher in context

Building this map preview

Daniel M. Gordon

Research overview

Is this your work?

3 publications

On difference sets with small λλλ

On the Density of the Set of Known Hadamard Orders

Perfect single error-correcting codes in the Johnson Scheme

See the researcher in context

Building this map preview

On difference sets with small $λ$