Researcher profile

Daniel Kennedy

Daniel Kennedy contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
2topics
3close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

Coulomb collisions in strongly anisotropic plasmas II. Cyclotron cooling in laboratory pair plasmas

The behaviour of a strongly-magnetized collisional electron-positron plasma which is optically thin to cyclotron radiation is considered, and the distribution functions accessible to it on the various timescales in the system are calculated. Particular attention is paid to the limit in which the collision time exceeds the radiation emission time, making the electron distribution function strongly anisotropic. Indeed, these are the exact conditions likely to be attained in the first laboratory electron-positron plasma experiments currently being developed, which will typically have very low densities and be confined in very strong magnetic fields. The constraint of strong-magnetization adds an additional complication in that long-range Coulomb collisions, which are usually negligible, must now be considered. A rigorous collision operator for these long-range collisions has never been written down. Nevertheless, we show that the collisional scattering can be accounted for without knowing the explicit form of this collision operator. The rate of radiation emission is calculated and it is found that the loss of energy from the plasma is proportional to the parallel collision frequency multiplied by a factor that only depends logarithmically on plasma parameters. That is, this is a self-accelerating process, meaning that the bulk of the energy will be lost in a few collision times. We show that in a simple case, that of straight field-line geometry, there are no unstable drift waves in such plasmas, despite being far from Maxwellian.

preprint2020arXiv

The turbulent dynamics of Jupiter's and Saturn's weather layers: order out of chaos?

The weather layers of the gas giant planets, Jupiter and Saturn, comprise the shallow atmospheric layers that are influenced energetically by a combination of incoming solar radiation and localised latent heating of condensates, as well as by upwelling heat from their planetary interiors. They are also the most accessible regions of those planets to direct observations. Recent analyses in Oxford of cloud-tracked winds on Jupiter have demonstrated that kinetic energy is injected into the weather layer at scales comparable to the Rossby radius of deformation and cascades both upscale, mostly into the extra-tropical zonal jets, and downscale to the smallest resolvable scales in Cassini images. The large-scale flow on both Jupiter and Saturn appears to equilibrate towards a state which is close to marginal instability according to Arnol'd's 2nd stability theorem. This scenario is largely reproduced in a hierarchy of numerical models of giant planet weather layers, including relatively realistic models which seek to predict thermal and dynamical structures using a full set of parameterisations of radiative transfer, interior heat sources and even moist convection. Such models include the Jason GCM, developed in Oxford, which also represents the formation of (energetically passive) clouds of NH3, NH4SH and H2O condensates and the transport of condensable tracers. Recent results show some promise in comparison with observations from the Cassini and Juno missions, but some observed features (such as Jupiter's Great Red Spot and other compact ovals) are not yet captured spontaneously by any weather layer model. We review recent work in this vein and discuss a number of open questions for future study.