Researcher profile

Daniel J. Ringis

Daniel J. Ringis contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Per-clip adaptive Lagrangian multiplier optimisation with low-resolution proxies

This work focuses on reducing the computational cost of repeated video encodes by using a lower resolution clip as a proxy. Features extracted from the low resolution clip are used to learn an optimal lagrange multiplier for rate control on the original resolution clip. In addition to reducing the computational cost and encode time by using lower resolution clips, we also investigate the use of older, but faster codecs such as H.264 to create proxies. This work shows that the computational load is reduced by 22 times using 144p proxies. Our tests are based on the YouTube UGC dataset, hence our results are based on a practical instance of the adaptive bitrate encoding problem. Further improvements are possible, by optimising the placement and sparsity of operating points required for the rate distortion curves.

preprint2022arXiv

Per-clip and per-bitrate adaptation of the Lagrangian multiplier in video coding

In the past ten years there have been significant developments in optimization of transcoding parameters on a per-clip rather than per-genre basis. In our recent work we have presented per-clip optimization for the Lagrangian multiplier in Rate controlled compression, which yielded BD-Rate improvements of approximately 2\% across a corpus of videos using HEVC. However, in a video streaming application, the focus is on optimizing the rate/distortion tradeoff at a particular bitrate and not on average across a range of performance. We observed in previous work that a particular multiplier might give BD rate improvements over a certain range of bitrates, but not the entire range. Using different parameters across the range would improve gains overall. Therefore here we present a framework for choosing the best Lagrangian multiplier on a per-operating point basis across a range of bitrates. In effect, we are trying to find the para-optimal gain across bitrate and distortion for a single clip. In the experiments presented we employ direct optimization techniques to estimate this Lagrangian parameter path approximately 2,000 video clips. The clips are primarily from the YouTube-UGC dataset. We optimize both for bitrate savings as well as distortion metrics (PSNR, SSIM).

preprint2020arXiv

Using modern motion estimation algorithms in existing video codecs

Motion estimation is a key component of any modern video codec. Our understanding of motion and the estimation of motion from video has come a very long way since 2000. More than 135 different algorithms have been recently reviewed by Scharstein et al http://vision.middlebury.edu/flow/. These new algorithms differ markedly from Block Matching which has been the mainstay of video compression for some time. This paper presents comparisons of H.264 and MP4 compression using different motion estimation methods. In so doing we present as well methods for adapting pre-computed motion fields for use within a codec. We do not observe significant gains to be had with the methods chosen w.r.t. Rate Distortion tradeoffs but the results reflect a significantly more complex interrelationship between motion and compression than would be expected. There remains much more to be done to improve the coverage of this comparison to the emerging standards but these initial results show that there is value in these explorations.