Researcher profile

Daniel Cabarcas

Daniel Cabarcas contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2021arXiv

Improvements of Algebraic Attacks for solving the Rank Decoding and MinRank problems

Rank Decoding (RD) is the main underlying problem in rank-based cryptography. Based on this problem and quasi-cyclic versions of it, very efficient schemes have been proposed recently, such as those in the ROLLO and RQC submissions, which have reached the second round of the NIST Post-Quantum competition. Two main approaches have been studied to solve RD: combinatorial ones and algebraic ones. While the former has been studied extensively, a better understanding of the latter was recently obtained by Bardet et al. (EUROCRYPT20) where it appeared that algebraic attacks can often be more efficient than combinatorial ones for cryptographic parameters. This paper gives substantial improvements upon this attack in terms both of complexity and of the assumptions required by the cryptanalysis. We present attacks for ROLLO-I-128, 192, and 256 with bit complexity respectively in 70, 86, and 158, to be compared to 117, 144, and 197 for the aforementionned previous attack. Moreover, unlike this previous attack, ours does not need generic Gröbner basis algorithms since it only requires to solve a linear system. For a case called overdetermined, this modeling allows us to avoid Gröbner basis computations by going directly to solving a linear system. For the other case, called underdetermined, we also improve the results from the previous attack by combining the Ourivski-Johansson modeling together with a new modeling for a generic MinRank instance; the latter modeling allows us to refine the analysis of MinRank's complexity given in the paper by Verbel et al. (PQC19). Finally, since the proposed parameters of ROLLO and RQC are completely broken by our new attack, we give examples of new parameters for ROLLO and RQC that make them resistant to our attacks. These new parameters show that these systems remain attractive, with a loss of only about 50\% in terms of key size for ROLLO-I.

preprint2020arXiv

On the Complexity of Solving Generic Over-determined Bilinear Systems

In this paper, we study the complexity of solving generic over-determined bilinear systems over a finite field $\mathbb{F}$. Given a generic bilinear sequence $B \in \mathbb{F}[\mathbf{x},\mathbf{y}]$, with respect to a partition of variables $\mathbf{x}$, $\mathbf{y}$, we show that, the solutions of the system $B= \mathbf{0}$ can be efficiently found on the $\mathbb{F}[\mathbf{y}]$-module generated by $B$. Following this observation, we propose three variations of Gröbner basis algorithms, that only involve multiplication by monomials in they-variables, namely, $\mathbf{y}$-XL, based on the XL algorithm, $\mathbf{y}$-MLX, based on the mutant XL algorithm, and $\mathbf{y}$-HXL, basedon a hybrid approach. We define notions of regularity for over-determined bilinear systems,that capture the idea of genericity, and we develop the necessary theoretical tools to estimate the complexity of the algorithms for such sequences. We also present extensive experimental results, testing our conjecture, verifying our results, and comparing the complexity of the various methods.