BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Daniel B. Szyld

Daniel B. Szyld contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
math.NANumerical Analysis

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

A posteriori superlinear convergence bounds for block conjugate gradient

In this paper, we extend to the block case, the a posteriori bound showing superlinear convergence of Conjugate Gradients developed in [J. Comput. Applied Math., 48 (1993), pp. 327-341]; that is, we obtain similar bounds, but now for block Conjugate Gradients. We also present a series of computational experiments illustrating the validity of the bound developed here, as well as the bound from [SIAM Review, 47 (2005), pp. 247-272] using angles between subspaces. Using these bounds, we make some observations on the onset of superlinearity, and how this onset depends on the eigenvalue distribution and the block size.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

On non-Hermitian positive (semi)definite linear algebraic systems arising from dissipative Hamiltonian DAEs

We discuss different cases of dissipative Hamiltonian differential-algebraic equations and the linear algebraic systems that arise in their linearization or discretization. For each case we give examples from practical applications. An important feature of the linear algebraic systems is that the (non-Hermitian) system matrix has a positive definite or semidefinite Hermitian part. In the positive definite case we can solve the linear algebraic systems iteratively by Krylov subspace methods based on efficient three-term recurrences. We illustrate the performance of these iterative methods on several examples. The semidefinite case can be challenging and requires additional techniques to deal with "singular part", while the "positive definite part" can still be treated with the three-term recurrence methods.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

On the Convergence of Randomized and Greedy Relaxation Schemes for Solving Nonsingular Linear Systems of Equations

We extend results known for the randomized Gauss-Seidel and the Gauss-Southwell methods for the case of a Hermitian and positive definite matrix to certain classes of non-Hermitian matrices. We obtain convergence results for a whole range of parameters describing the probabilities in the randomized method or the greedy choice strategy in the Gauss-Southwell-type methods. We identify those choices which make our convergence bounds best possible. Our main tool is to use weighted l1-norms to measure the residuals. A major result is that the best convergence bounds that we obtain for the expected values in the randomized algorithm are as good as the best for the deterministic, but more costly algorithms of Gauss-Southwell type. Numerical experiments illustrate the convergence of the method and the bounds obtained. Comparisons with the randomized Kaczmarz method are also presented.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Asynchronous Richardson iterations

We consider asynchronous versions of the first and second order Richardson methods for solving linear systems of equations. These methods depend on parameters whose values are chosen a priori. We explore the parameter values that can be proven to give convergence of the asynchronous methods. This is the first such analysis for asynchronous second order methods. We find that for the first order method, the optimal parameter value for the synchronous case also gives an asynchronously convergent method. For the second order method, the parameter ranges for which we can prove asynchronous convergence do not contain the optimal parameter values for the synchronous iteration. In practice, however, the asynchronous second order iterations may still converge using the optimal parameter values, or parameter values close to the optimal ones, despite this result. We explore this behavior with a multithreaded parallel implementation of the asynchronous methods.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access