BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Daniel Arnström

Daniel Arnström contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
eess.SYmath.OCSystems and Control

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
3topics
2close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Overall Complexity Certification of a Standard Branch and Bound Method for Mixed-Integer Quadratic Programming

This paper presents a method to certify the computational complexity of a standard Branch and Bound method for solving Mixed-Integer Quadratic Programming (MIQP) problems defined as instances of a multi-parametric MIQP. Beyond previous work, not only the size of the binary search tree is considered, but also the exact complexity of solving the relaxations in the nodes by using recent result from exact complexity certification of active-set QP methods. With the algorithm proposed in this paper, a total worst-case number of QP iterations to be performed in order to solve the MIQP problem can be determined as a function of the parameter in the problem. An important application of the proposed method is Model Predictive Control for hybrid systems, that can be formulated as an MIQP that has to be solved in real-time. The usefulness of the proposed method is successfully illustrated in numerical examples.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

A Unifying Complexity Certification Framework for Active-Set Methods for Convex Quadratic Programming

In model predictive control (MPC) an optimization problem has to be solved at each time step, which in real-time applications makes it important to solve these optimization problems efficiently and to have good upper bounds on worst-case solution time. Often for linear MPC problems, the optimization problem in question is a quadratic program (QP) that depends on parameters such as system states and reference signals. A popular class of methods for solving such QPs is active-set methods, where a sequence of linear systems of equations is solved. We propose an algorithm for computing which sequence of subproblems an active-set algorithm will solve, for every parameter of interest. By knowing these sequences, a worst-case bound on how many iterations, and ultimately the maximum time, the active-set algorithm requires to converge can be determined. The usefulness of the proposed method is illustrated on a set of QPs, originating from MPC problems, by computing the exact worst-case number of iterations primal and dual active-set algorithms require to reach optimality.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access