BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Danfeng

Danfeng contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Cryptography and SecuritySoftware Engineering

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
6works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

6 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Example-Based Vulnerability Detection and Repair in Java Code

The Java libraries JCA and JSSE offer cryptographic APIs to facilitate secure coding. When developers misuse some of the APIs, their code becomes vulnerable to cyber-attacks. To eliminate such vulnerabilities, people built tools to detect security-API misuses via pattern matching. However, most tools do not (1) fix misuses or (2) allow users to extend tools&#39; pattern sets. To overcome both limitations, we created Seader-an example-based approach to detect and repair security-API misuses. Given an exemplar <insecure, secure>code pair, Seader compares the snippets to infer any API-misuse template and corresponding fixing edit. Based on the inferred info, given a program, Seader performs inter-procedural static analysis to search for security-API misuses and to propose customized fixes. For evaluation, we applied Seader to 28 <insecure, secure> codepairs; Seader successfully inferred 21 unique API-misuse templates and related fixes. With these <vulnerability, fix> patterns, we applied SEADER to a program benchmark that has 86 known vulnerabilities. Seader detected vulnerabilities with 95% precision, 72% recall, and82% F-score. We also applied Seader to 100 open-source projects and manually checked 77 suggested repairs; 76 of the repairs were correct. Seader can help developers correctly use security APIs.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Industrial Experience of Finding Cryptographic Vulnerabilities in Large-scale Codebases

Enterprise environment often screens large-scale (millions of lines of code) codebases with static analysis tools to find bugs and vulnerabilities. Parfait is a static code analysis tool used in Oracle to find security vulnerabilities in industrial codebases. Recently, many studies show that there are complicated cryptographic vulnerabilities caused by misusing cryptographic APIs in Java. In this paper, we describe how we realize a precise and scalable detection of these complicated cryptographic vulnerabilities based on Parfait framework. The key challenge in the detection of cryptographic vulnerabilities is the high false alarm rate caused by pseudo-influences. Pseudo-influences happen if security-irrelevant constants are used in constructing security-critical values. Static analysis is usually unable to distinguish them from hard-coded constants that expose sensitive information. We tackle this problem by specializing the backward dataflow analysis used in Parfait with refinement insights, an idea from the tool CryptoGuard. We evaluate our analyzer on a comprehensive Java cryptographic vulnerability benchmark and eleven large real-world applications. The results show that the Parfait-based cryptographic vulnerability detector can find real-world cryptographic vulnerabilities in large-scale codebases with high true-positive rates and low runtime cost.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Data-Driven Vulnerability Detection and Repair in Java Code

Java platform provides various APIs to facilitate secure coding. However, correctly using security APIs is usually challenging for developers who lack cybersecurity training. Prior work shows that many developers misuse security APIs; such misuses can introduce vulnerabilities into software, void security protections, and present security exploits to hackers. To eliminate such API-related vulnerabilities, this paper presents SEADER -- our new approach that detects and repairs security API misuses. Given an exemplar, insecure code snippet, and its secure counterpart, SEADER compares the snippets and conducts data dependence analysis to infer the security API misuse templates and corresponding fixing operations. Based on the inferred information, given a program, SEADER performs inter-procedural static analysis to search for any security API misuse and to propose customized fixing suggestions for those vulnerabilities. To evaluate SEADER, we applied it to 25 <insecure, secure> code pairs, and SEADER successfully inferred 18 unique API misuse templates and related fixes. With these vulnerability repair patterns, we further applied SEADER to 10 open-source projects that contain in total 32 known vulnerabilities. Our experiment shows that SEADER detected vulnerabilities with 100% precision, 84% recall, and 91% accuracy. Additionally, we applied SEADER to 100 Apache open-source projects and detected 988 vulnerabilities; SEADER always customized repair suggestions correctly. Based on SEADER&#39;s outputs, we filed 60 pull requests. Up till now, developers of 18 projects have offered positive feedbacks on SEADER&#39;s suggestions. Our results indicate that SEADER can effectively help developers detect and fix security API misuses. Whereas prior work either detects API misuses or suggests simple fixes, SEADER is the first tool to do both for nontrivial vulnerability repairs.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Coding Practices and Recommendations of Spring Security for Enterprise Applications

Spring security is tremendously popular among practitioners for its ease of use to secure enterprise applications. In this paper, we study the application framework misconfiguration vulnerabilities in the light of Spring security, which is relatively understudied in the existing literature. Towards that goal, we identify 6 types of security anti-patterns and 4 insecure vulnerable defaults by conducting a measurement-based approach on 28 Spring applications. Our analysis shows that security risks associated with the identified security anti-patterns and insecure defaults can leave the enterprise application vulnerable to a wide range of high-risk attacks. To prevent these high-risk attacks, we also provide recommendations for practitioners. Consequently, our study has contributed one update to the official Spring security documentation while other security issues identified in this study are being considered for future major releases by Spring security community.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Methodologies for Quantifying (Re-)randomization Security and Timing under JIT-ROP

Just-in-time return-oriented programming (JIT-ROP) allows one to dynamically discover instruction pages and launch code reuse attacks, effectively bypassing most fine-grained address space layout randomization (ASLR) protection. However, in-depth questions regarding the impact of code (re-)randomization on code reuse attacks have not been studied. For example, how would one compute the re-randomization interval effectively by considering the speed of gadget convergence to defeat JIT-ROP attacks?; how do starting pointers in JIT-ROP impact gadget availability and gadget convergence time?; what impact do fine-grained code randomizations have on the Turing-complete expressive power of JIT-ROP payloads? We conduct a comprehensive measurement study on the effectiveness of fine-grained code randomization schemes, with 5 tools, 20 applications including 6 browsers, 1 browser engine, and 25 dynamic libraries. We provide methodologies to measure JIT-ROP gadget availability, quality, and their Turing-complete expressiveness, as well as to empirically determine the upper bound of re-randomization intervals in re-randomization schemes using the Turing-complete (TC), priority, MOV TC, and payload gadget sets. Experiments show that the upper bound ranges from 1.5 to 3.5 seconds in our tested applications. Besides, our results show that locations of leaked pointers used in JIT-ROP attacks have no impacts on gadget availability, but have an impact on how fast attackers find gadgets. Our results also show that instruction-level single-round randomization thwarts current gadget finding techniques under the JIT-ROP threat model.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Security Certification in Payment Card Industry: Testbeds, Measurements, and Recommendations

The massive payment card industry (PCI) involves various entities such as merchants, issuer banks, acquirer banks, and card brands. Ensuring security for all entities that process payment card information is a challenging task. The PCI Security Standards Council requires all entities to be compliant with the PCI Data Security Standard (DSS), which specifies a series of security requirements. However, little is known regarding how well PCI DSS is enforced in practice. In this paper, we take a measurement approach to systematically evaluate the PCI DSS certification process for e-commerce websites. We develop an e-commerce web application testbed, BuggyCart, which can flexibly add or remove 35 PCI DSS related vulnerabilities. Then we use the testbed to examine the capability and limitations of PCI scanners and the rigor of the certification process. We find that there is an alarming gap between the security standard and its real-world enforcement. None of the 6 PCI scanners we tested are fully compliant with the PCI scanning guidelines, issuing certificates to merchants that still have major vulnerabilities. To further examine the compliance status of real-world e-commerce websites, we build a new lightweight scanning tool named PciCheckerLite and scan 1,203 e-commerce websites across various business sectors. The results confirm that 86% of the websites have at least one PCI DSS violation that should have disqualified them as non-compliant. Our in-depth accuracy analysis also shows that PciCheckerLite&#39;s output is more precise than w3af. We reached out to the PCI Security Council to share our research results to improve the enforcement in practice.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access