BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Dan Saracino

Dan Saracino contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
math.CO

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
6works
0followers
1topics
1close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

6 published item(s)

preprint2014arXiv

The 2-color Rado Number of $x_1+x_2+\cdots +x_{m-1}=ax_m,$ II

In the first installment of this series, we proved that, for every integer $a\geq 3$ and every $m\geq 2a^2-a+2$, the 2-color Rado number of $x_1 + x_2 + \cdots + x_{m-1} = ax_m$ is $\lceil\frac{m-1}{a} \lceil\frac{m-1}{a} \rceil\rceil$. Here we obtain the best possible improvement of the bound on $m.$ We prove that if $3|a$ then the 2-color Rado number is $\lceil\frac{m-1}{a} \lceil\frac{m-1}{a} \rceil\rceil$ when $m\geq 2a+1$ but not when $m=2a,$ and that if $3\nmid a$ then the 2-color Rado number is $\lceil\frac{m-1}{a} \lceil\frac{m-1}{a} \rceil\rceil$ when $m\geq 2a+2$ but not when $m=2a+1.$ We also determine the 2-color Rado number for all $a\geq 3$ and $m\geq \frac{a}{2}+1.$

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

The 2-color Rado number of $x_1+x_2+\cdots +x_n=y_1+y_2+\cdots +y_k$

In 1982, Beutelspacher and Brestovansky determined the 2-color Rado number of the equation $$x_1+x_2+\cdots +x_{m-1}=x_m$$ for all $m\geq 3.$ Here we extend their result by determining the 2-color Rado number of the equation $$x_1+x_2+\cdots +x_n=y_1+y_2+\cdots +y_k$$ for all $n\geq 2$ and $k\geq 2.$ As a consequence, we determine the 2-color Rado number of $$x_1+x_2+\cdots +x_n=a_1y_1+\cdots +a_{\ell}y_{\ell}$$ in all cases where $n\geq 2$ and $n\geq a_1+\cdots +a_{\ell},$ and in most cases where $n\geq 2$ and $2n\geq a_1+\cdots +a_{\ell}.$

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

The 2-color Rado number of $x_1+x_2+...+x_{m-1}=ax_m$

In 1982, Beutelspacher and Brestovansky proved that for every integer $m\geq 3,$ the 2-color Rado number of the equation $$x_1+x_2+...+x_{m-1}=x_m$$ is $m^2-m-1.$ In 2008, Schaal and Vestal proved that, for every $m\geq 6,$ the 2-color Rado number of $$x_1+x_2+...+x_{m-1}=2x_m$$ is $\lceil \frac{m-1}{2}\lceil\frac{m-1}{2}\rceil\rceil.$ Here we prove that, for every integer $a\geq 3$ and every $m\geq 2a^2-a+2$, the 2-color Rado number of $$x_1+x_2+...+x_{m-1}=ax_m$$ is $\lceil\frac{m-1}{a}\lceil\frac{m-1}{a}\rceil\rceil.$ For the case $a=3,$ we show that our formula gives the Rado number for all $m\geq 7,$ and we determine the Rado number for all $m\geq 3.$

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

Modified Growth Diagrams, Permutation Pivots, and the BXW map $ϕ^*$

In their paper [1] on Wilf-equivalence for singleton classes, Backelin, Xin, and West introduce a transformation $ϕ^*$, defined by an iterative process and operating on (all) full rook placements on Ferrers boards. In [3], Bousquet-M$\acute{\textrm{e}}$lou and Steingr$\acute{\textrmı}$msson prove the analogue of the main result of [1] in the context of involutions, and in so doing they must prove that $ϕ^*$ commutes with the operation of taking inverses. The proof of this commutation result is long and difficult, and Bousquet-M$\acute{\textrm{e}}$lou and Steingr$\acute{\textrmı}$msson ask if $ϕ^*$ might be reformulated in such a way as to make this result obvious. In the present paper we provide such a reformulation of $ϕ^*$, by modifying the growth diagram algorithm of Fomin [4,5]. This also answers a question of Krattenthaler [6, problem 4], who notes that a bijection defined by the unmodified Fomin algorithm obviously commutes with inverses, and asks what the connection is between this bijection and $ϕ^*$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

On Two Bijections from S_n(321) to S_n(132)

Let S_n(321) (respectively, S_n(132)) denote the set of all permutations of {1,2,...,n} that avoid the pattern 321 (respectively, the pattern 132). Elizalde and Pak gave a bijection Theta from S_n(321) to S_n(132) that preserves the numbers of fixed points and excedances for each element of S_n(321), and commutes with the operation of taking inverses. Bloom and Saracino proved that another bijection Gamma from S_n(321) to S_n(132), introduced by Robertson, has the same properties, and they later gave a pictorial reformulation of Gamma that made these results more transparent. Here we give a pictorial reformulation of Theta, from which it follows that, although the original definitions of Theta and Gamma are very different, these two bijections are in fact related to each other in a very simple way, by using inversion, reversal, and complementation.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access