BZPEERSource author record
Explore this author’s publications, collaborators and research topics. This catalog record has not been claimed by its author.
Catalog footprint
Published work
In the first installment of this series, we proved that, for every integer a≥3 and every m≥2a2−a+2, the 2-color Rado number of x1+x2+⋯+xm−1=axm is ⌈am−1⌈am−1⌉⌉. Here we obtain the best possible improvement of the bound on m. We prove that if 3∣a then the 2-color Rado number is ⌈am−1⌈am−1⌉⌉ when m≥2a+1 but not when m=2a, and that if 3∤a then the 2-color Rado number is ⌈am−1⌈am−1⌉⌉ when m≥2a+2 but not when m=2a+1. We also determine the 2-color Rado number for all a≥3 and m≥2a+1.
In 1982, Beutelspacher and Brestovansky determined the 2-color Rado number of the equation x1+x2+⋯+xm−1=xm for all m≥3. Here we extend their result by determining the 2-color Rado number of the equation x1+x2+⋯+xn=y1+y2+⋯+yk for all n≥2 and k≥2. As a consequence, we determine the 2-color Rado number of x1+x2+⋯+xn=a1y1+⋯+aℓyℓ in all cases where n≥2 and n≥a1+⋯+aℓ, and in most cases where n≥2 and 2n≥a1+⋯+aℓ.
In 1982, Beutelspacher and Brestovansky proved that for every integer m≥3, the 2-color Rado number of the equation x1+x2+...+xm−1=xm is m2−m−1. In 2008, Schaal and Vestal proved that, for every m≥6, the 2-color Rado number of x1+x2+...+xm−1=2xm is ⌈2m−1⌈2m−1⌉⌉. Here we prove that, for every integer a≥3 and every m≥2a2−a+2, the 2-color Rado number of x1+x2+...+xm−1=axm is ⌈am−1⌈am−1⌉⌉. For the case a=3, we show that our formula gives the Rado number for all m≥7, and we determine the Rado number for all m≥3.
Stankova and West proved in 2002 that the patterns 231 and 312 are shape-Wilf-equivalent. Their proof was nonbijective and fairly complicated. We give a new characterization of 231 and 312 avoiding full rook placements and use this to give a simple bijective proof of the shape-Wilf- equivalence.
In their paper [1] on Wilf-equivalence for singleton classes, Backelin, Xin, and West introduce a transformation ϕ∗, defined by an iterative process and operating on (all) full rook placements on Ferrers boards. In [3], Bousquet-Meˊlou and Steingrıˊmsson prove the analogue of the main result of [1] in the context of involutions, and in so doing they must prove that ϕ∗ commutes with the operation of taking inverses. The proof of this commutation result is long and difficult, and Bousquet-Meˊlou and Steingrıˊmsson ask if ϕ∗ might be reformulated in such a way as to make this result obvious. In the present paper we provide such a reformulation of ϕ∗, by modifying the growth diagram algorithm of Fomin [4,5]. This also answers a question of Krattenthaler [6, problem 4], who notes that a bijection defined by the unmodified Fomin algorithm obviously commutes with inverses, and asks what the connection is between this bijection and ϕ∗.
Let S_n(321) (respectively, S_n(132)) denote the set of all permutations of {1,2,...,n} that avoid the pattern 321 (respectively, the pattern 132). Elizalde and Pak gave a bijection Theta from S_n(321) to S_n(132) that preserves the numbers of fixed points and excedances for each element of S_n(321), and commutes with the operation of taking inverses. Bloom and Saracino proved that another bijection Gamma from S_n(321) to S_n(132), introduced by Robertson, has the same properties, and they later gave a pictorial reformulation of Gamma that made these results more transparent. Here we give a pictorial reformulation of Theta, from which it follows that, although the original definitions of Theta and Gamma are very different, these two bijections are in fact related to each other in a very simple way, by using inversion, reversal, and complementation.
Research graph
Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.
BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.