Source author record

Da-Ming Chen

Explore this author’s publications, collaborators and research topics. This catalog record has not been claimed by its author.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

astro-ph astro-ph.GA

Catalog footprint

Research overview

3works

2topics

2close collaborators

Actions

Is this your work?

Open graph Browse papers

preprint2020arXiv

Comparison of Modeling SPARC spiral galaxies' rotation curves: halo models vs MOND

We investigate a sub-sample of the rotation curves consisting of 45 HSB non-bulgy spiral galaxies selected from SPARC (Spitzer Photometry and Accurate Rotation Curves) database by using two dark halo models (NFW and Burkert) and MOdified Newtonian Dynamics (MOND) theory. Among these three models, the core-dominated Burkert halo model provides a better description of the observed data ( $χ_ν^2$ = 0.33) than Navarro, Frenk and White (NFW, $χ_ν^2$ = 0.45) and MOND model ( $χ_ν^2$ = 0.58). So our results show that, for dark halo models, the selected 45 HSB non-bulgy spiral galaxies prefer a cored density profile to the cuspy one (NFW); We also positively find that there is a correlation between $ρ_0$ and $r_0$ in Burkert model. For MOND fits, when we take $a_0$ as a free parameter, there is no obvious correlation between $a_0$ and disk central surface brightness at 3.6 $μm$ of these HSB spiral galaxies, which is in line with the basic assumption of MOND that $a_0$ should be a universal constant. Interestingly, our fittings gives $a_0$ an average value of $(0.74 \pm 0.45) \times 10^{- 8}\rm {cm\ s^{- 2}}$ if we exclude the three highest values in the sample, which is smaller than the standard value ( $1.21 \times 10^{-8}\rm {cm\ s^{- 2}}$ ).

preprint2010arXiv

Contradiction between strong lensing statistics and a feedback solution to the cusp/core problem

Standard cosmology has many successes on large scales, but faces some fundamental difficulties on small, galactic scales. One such difficulty is the cusp/core problem. High resolution observations of the rotation curves for dark matter dominated low surface brightness (LSB) galaxies imply that galactic dark matter halos have a density profile with a flat central core, whereas N-body structure formation simulations predict a divergent (cuspy) density profile at the center. It has been proposed that this problem can be resolved by stellar feedback driving turbulent gas motion that erases the initial cusp. However, strong gravitational lensing prefers a cuspy density profile for galactic halos. In this paper, we use the most recent high resolution observations of the rotation curves of LSB galaxies to fit the core size as a function of halo mass, and compare the resultant lensing probability to the observational results for the well defined combined sample of the Cosmic Lens All-Sky Survey (CLASS) and Jodrell Bank/Very Large Array Astrometric Survey (JVAS). The lensing probabilities based on such density profiles are too low to match the observed lensing in CLASS/JVAS. High baryon densities in the galaxies that dominate the lensing statistics can reconcile this discrepancy, but only if they steepen the mass profile rather than making it more shallow. This places contradictory demands upon the effects of baryons on the central mass profiles of galaxies.

preprint2004arXiv

The amplitude of mass fluctuations and mass density of the Universe constrained by strong gravitational lensing

We investigate the linear amplitude of mass fluctuations in the universe, $σ_8$ , and the present mass density parameter of the Universe, $Ω_\mathrm{m}$ , from the statistical strong gravitational lensing. We use the two populations of lens halos model with fixed cooling mass scale $M_\mathrm{c}=3\times 10^{13}h^{-1}M_{\sun}$ to match the observed lensing probabilities, and leave $σ_8$ or $Ω_\mathrm{m}$ as a free parameter to be constrained by data. Another varying parameter is the equation of state of dark energy $ω$ , and its typical values of -1, -2/3, -1/2 and -1/3 are investigated. We find that $σ_8$ is degenerate with $Ω_\mathrm{m}$ in a way similar to that suggested by present day cluster abundance as well as cosmic shear lensing measurements: $σ_8Ω_\mathrm{m}^{0.6}\approx 0.33$ (Bahcall & Bode\cite{bahcall03a} and references therein). However, both $σ_8\leq 0.7$ and $Ω_\mathrm{m}\leq 0.2$ can be safely ruled out, the best value is when $σ_8=1.0$ , $Ω_\mathrm{m}=0.3$ and $ω=-1$ . This result is different from that obtained by Bahcall & Bode (\cite{bahcall03a}), who gives $σ_8 =0.98\pm 0.1$ and $Ω_m =0.17\pm 0.05$ . For $σ_8=1.0$ , higher value of $Ω_\mathrm{m}=0.35$ requires $ω=-2/3$ and $Ω_\mathrm{m}=0.40$ requires $ω=-1/2$ .

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.