Researcher profile

D. J. Dunstan

D. J. Dunstan contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - Baseline
4works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2021arXiv

Carbon nanotubes collapse phase diagram with arbitrary number of walls. Collapse modes and macroscopic analog

Carbon nanotubes tend to collapse when their diameters exceed a certain threshold, or when a sufficiently large external pressure is applied on their walls. Their radial stability of tubes has been studied in each of these cases, however a general theory able to predict collapse is still lacking. Here, we propose a simple model predicting stability limits as a function of the tube diameter, the number of walls and the pressure. The model is supported by atomistic simulations, experiments, and is used to plot collapse phase diagrams. We have identified the most stable carbon nanotube, which can support a maximum pressure of 18 GPa before collapsing. The latter was identified as a multiwall tube with an internal tube diameter of 12nm and 30 walls. This maximum pressure is lowered depending on the internal tube diameter and the number of walls. We then identify a tube diameter domain in which the radial mechanical stability can be treated as equivalent to macroscopic tubes, known to be described by the canonical Lévy-Carrier law. This multiscale behavior is shown to be in good agreement with experiments based on O-ring gaskets collapse, proposed as a simple macroscopic parallel to nanotubes in this domain.

preprint2015arXiv

Graphite under uniaxial compression along c-axis: a new parameter relates out-of-plane strain to in-plane phonon frequency

Stacking graphene sheets forms graphite. Two in-plane vibrational modes of graphite, E1u and E2g(2), are derived from graphene E2g mode, the shifts of which under compression are all considered as results of in-plane bond shortening. Values of Gruneisen parameter have been reported to quantify such relation. However, the reason why the shift rates of these three modes with pressure differ is unclear. In this work, we introduce a new parameter to quantify the contribution of out-of-plane strain to the in-plane vibrational frequencies, suggesting that the compression of π-electrons plays a non-negligible part in both graphite and graphene under high pressure.

preprint2012arXiv

Pressure coefficients of Raman modes of carbon nanotubes resolved by chirality: Environmental effect on graphene sheet

Studies of the mechanical properties of single-walled carbon nanotubes are hindered by the availability only of ensembles of tubes with a range of diameters. Tunable Raman excitation spectroscopy picks out identifiable tubes. Under high pressure, the radial breathing mode shows a strong environmental effect shown here to be largely independent of the nature of the environment . For the G-mode, the pressure coefficient varies with diameter consistent with the thick-wall tube model. However, results show an unexpectedly strong environmental effect on the pressure coefficients. Reappraisal of data for graphene and graphite gives the G-mode Grueuneisen parameter gamma = 1.34 and the shear deformation parameter beta = 1.34.

preprint2012arXiv

Raman excitation spectroscopy of carbon nanotubes: effects of pressure medium and pressure

Raman excitation and emission spectra for the radial breathing mode (RBM) are reported, together with a preliminary analysis. From the position of the peaks on the two-dimensional plot of excitation resonance energy against Raman shift, the chiral indices (m, n) for each peak are identified. Peaks shift from their positions in air when different pressure media are added - water, hexane, sulphuric acid - and when the nanotubes are unbundled in water with surfactant and sonication. The shift is about 2 - 3 cm-1 in RBM frequency, but unexpectedly large in resonance energy, being spread over up to 100meV for a given peak. This contrasts with the effect of pressure. The shift of the peaks of semiconducting nanotubes in water under pressure is orthogonal to the shift from air to water. This permits the separation of the effects of the pressure medium and the pressure, and will enable the true pressure coefficients of the RBM and the other Raman peaks for each (m, n) to be established unambiguously.