Researcher profile

D. Girardi

D. Girardi contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

cond-mat.stat-mech physics.comp-ph

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - Baseline

3works

0followers

2topics

2close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

preprint2012arXiv

Dynamical behavior of the Niedermayer algorithm applied to Potts models

In this work we make a numerical study of the dynamic universality class of the Niedermayer algorithm applied to the two-dimensional Potts model with 2, 3, and 4 states. This algorithm updates clusters of spins and has a free parameter, $E_0$, which controls the size of these clusters, such that $E_0=1$ is the Metropolis algorithm and $E_0=0$ regains the Wolff algorithm, for the Potts model. For $-1<E_0<0$, only clusters of equal spins can be formed: we show that the mean size of the clusters of (possibly) turned spins initially grows with the linear size of the lattice, $L$, but eventually saturates at a given lattice size $\widetilde{L}$, which depends on $E_0$. For $L \geq \widetilde{L}$, the Niedermayer algorithm is in the same dynamic universality class of the Metropolis one, i.e, they have the same dynamic exponent. For $E_0>0$, spins in different states may be added to the cluster but the dynamic behavior is less efficient than for the Wolff algorithm ($E_0=0$). Therefore, our results show that the Wolff algorithm is the best choice for Potts models, when compared to the Niedermayer's generalization.

preprint2011arXiv

Influence of aperiodic modulations on first-order transitions: numerical study of the two-dimensional Potts model

We study the Potts model on a rectangular lattice with aperiodic modulations in its interactions along one direction. Numerical results are obtained using the Wolff algorithm and for many lattice sizes, allowing for a finite-size scaling analyses to be carried out. Three different self-dual aperiodic sequences are employed, which leads to more precise results, since the exact critical temperature is known. We analyze two models, with six and fifteen number of states: both present first-order transitions on their uniform versions. We show that the Harris-Luck criterion, originally introduced in the study of continuous transitions, is obeyed also for first-order ones. Also, we show that the new universality class that emerges for relevant aperiodic modulations depends on the number of states of the Potts model, as obtained elsewhere for random disorder, and on the aperiodic sequence. We determine the occurrence of log-periodic behavior, as expected for models with aperiodic modulated interactions.

preprint2010arXiv

Numerical simulation study of the dynamical behavior of the Niedermayer algorithm

We calculate the dynamic critical exponent for the Niedermayer algorithm applied to the two-dimensional Ising and XY models, for various values of the free parameter $E_0$. For $E_0=-1$ we regain the Metropolis algorithm and for $E_0=1$ we regain the Wolff algorithm. For $-1<E_0<1$, we show that the mean size of the clusters of (possibly) turned spins initially grows with the linear size of the lattice, $L$, but eventually saturates at a given lattice size $\widetilde{L}$, which depends on $E_0$. For $L>\widetilde{L}$, the Niedermayer algorithm is equivalent to the Metropolis one, i.e, they have the same dynamic exponent. For $E_0>1$, the autocorrelation time is always greater than for $E_0=1$ (Wolff) and, more important, it also grows faster than a power of $L$. Therefore, we show that the best choice of cluster algorithm is the Wolff one, when compared to the Nierdermayer generalization. We also obtain the dynamic behavior of the Wolff algorithm: although not conclusive, we propose a scaling law for the dependence of the autocorrelation time on $L$.