BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Cornelius Brand

Cornelius Brand appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
Computational ComplexityData Structures and Algorithmsmath.COmath.OCSymbolic Computation

Catalog footprint

What is connected

6works
5topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

6 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Edge-Cut Width: An Algorithmically Driven Analogue of Treewidth Based on Edge Cuts

Decompositional parameters such as treewidth are commonly used to obtain fixed-parameter algorithms for NP-hard graph problems. For problems that are W[1]-hard parameterized by treewidth, a natural alternative would be to use a suitable analogue of treewidth that is based on edge cuts instead of vertex separators. While tree-cut width has been coined as such an analogue of treewidth for edge cuts, its algorithmic applications have often led to disappointing results: out of twelve problems where one would hope for fixed-parameter tractability parameterized by an edge-cut based analogue to treewidth, eight were shown to be W[1]-hard parameterized by tree-cut width. As our main contribution, we develop an edge-cut based analogue to treewidth called edge-cut width. Edge-cut width is, intuitively, based on measuring the density of cycles passing through a spanning tree of the graph. Its benefits include not only a comparatively simple definition, but mainly that it has interesting algorithmic properties: it can be computed by a fixed-parameter algorithm, and it yields fixed-parameter algorithms for all the aforementioned problems where tree-cut width failed to do so.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

A Note on the Approximability of Deepest-Descent Circuit Steps

Linear programs (LPs) can be solved by polynomially many moves along the circuit direction improving the objective the most, so-called deepest-descent steps (dd-steps). Computing these steps is NP-hard (De Loera et al., arXiv, 2019), a consequence of the hardness of deciding the existence of an optimal circuit-neighbor (OCNP) on LPs with non-unique optima. We prove OCNP is easy under the promise of unique optima, but already $O(n^{1-\varepsilon})$-approximating dd-steps remains hard even for totally unimodular $n$-dimensional 0/1-LPs with a unique optimum. We provide a matching $n$-approximation.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

An Algorithmic Method of Partial Derivatives

We study the following problem and its applications: given a homogeneous degree-$d$ polynomial $g$ as an arithmetic circuit, and a $d \times d$ matrix $X$ whose entries are homogeneous linear polynomials, compute $g(\partial/\partial x_1, \ldots, \partial/\partial x_n) \det X$. By considering special cases of this problem we obtain faster parameterized algorithms for several problems, including the matroid $k$-parity and $k$-matroid intersection problems, faster \emph{deterministic} algorithms for testing if a linear space of matrices contains an invertible matrix (Edmonds's problem) and detecting $k$-internal outbranchings, and more. We also match the runtime of the fastest known deterministic algorithm for detecting subgraphs of bounded pathwidth, while using a new approach. Our approach raises questions in algebraic complexity related to Waring rank and the exponent of matrix multiplication $ω$. In particular, we study a new complexity measure on the space of homogeneous polynomials, namely the bilinear complexity of a polynomial's apolar algebra. Our algorithmic improvements are reflective of the fact that for the degree-$n$ determinant polynomial this quantity is at most $O(n 2^{ωn})$, whereas all known upper bounds on the Waring rank of this polynomial exceed $n!$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Fine-grained dichotomies for the Tutte plane and Boolean #CSP

Jaeger, Vertigan, and Welsh [15] proved a dichotomy for the complexity of evaluating the Tutte polynomial at fixed points: The evaluation is #P-hard almost everywhere, and the remaining points admit polynomial-time algorithms. Dell, Husfeldt, and Wahlén [9] and Husfeldt and Taslaman [12], in combination with Curticapean [7], extended the #P-hardness results to tight lower bounds under the counting exponential time hypothesis #ETH, with the exception of the line $y=1$, which was left open. We complete the dichotomy theorem for the Tutte polynomial under #ETH by proving that the number of all acyclic subgraphs of a given $n$-vertex graph cannot be determined in time $exp(o(n))$ unless #ETH fails. Another dichotomy theorem we strengthen is the one of Creignou and Hermann [6] for counting the number of satisfying assignments to a constraint satisfaction problem instance over the Boolean domain. We prove that all #P-hard cases are also hard under #ETH. The main ingredient is to prove that the number of independent sets in bipartite graphs with $n$ vertices cannot be computed in time $exp(o(n))$ unless #ETH fails. In order to prove our results, we use the block interpolation idea by Curticapean [7] and transfer it to systems of linear equations that might not directly correspond to interpolation.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

On the Complexity of Solving Zero-Dimensional Polynomial Systems via Projection

Given a zero-dimensional polynomial system consisting of n integer polynomials in n variables, we propose a certified and complete method to compute all complex solutions of the system as well as a corresponding separating linear form l with coefficients of small bit size. For computing l, we need to project the solutions into one dimension along O(n) distinct directions but no further algebraic manipulations. The solutions are then directly reconstructed from the considered projections. The first step is deterministic, whereas the second step uses randomization, thus being Las-Vegas. The theoretical analysis of our approach shows that the overall cost for the two problems considered above is dominated by the cost of carrying out the projections. We also give bounds on the bit complexity of our algorithms that are exclusively stated in terms of the number of variables, the total degree and the bitsize of the input polynomials.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Parameterized counting of trees, forests and matroid bases

We investigate the complexity of counting trees, forests and bases of matroids from a parameterized point of view. It turns out that the problems of computing the number of trees and forests with $k$ edges are $\# W[1]$-hard when parameterized by $k$. Together with the recent algorithm for deterministic matrix truncation by Lokshtanov et al. (ICALP 2015), the hardness result for $k$-forests implies $\# W[1]$-hardness of the problem of counting bases of a matroid when parameterized by rank or nullity, even if the matroid is restricted to be representable over a field of characteristic $2$. We complement this result by pointing out that the problem becomes fixed parameter tractable for matroids represented over a fixed finite field.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access