Researcher profile

Colin Van Oort

Colin Van Oort contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
2topics
3close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

Application of Convolutional Neural Networks to Identify Protostellar Outflows in CO Emission

We adopt the deep learning method CASI-3D (Convolutional Approach to Structure Identification-3D) to identify protostellar outflows in molecular line spectra. We conduct magneto-hydrodynamics simulations that model forming stars that launch protostellar outflows and use these to generate synthetic observations. We apply the 3D radiation transfer code RADMC-3D to model 12CO (J=1-0) line emission from the simulated clouds. We train two CASI-3D models: ME1 is trained to predict only the position of outflows, while MF is trained to predict the fraction of the mass coming from outflows in each voxel. The two models successfully identify all 60 previously visually identified outflows in Perseus. Additionally, CASI-3D finds 20 new high-confidence outflows. All of these have coherent high-velocity structures, and 17 of them have nearby young stellar objects, while the remaining three are outside the Spitzer survey coverage. The mass, momentum and energy of individual outflows in Perseus predicted by model MF is comparable to the previous estimations. This similarity is due to a cancelation in errors: previous calculations missed outflow material with velocities comparable to the cloud velocity, however, they compensate for this by over-estimating the amount of mass at higher velocities that has contamination from non-outflow gas. We show outflows likely driven by older sources have more high-velocity gas compared to those driven by younger sources.

preprint2020arXiv

Application of Convolutional Neural Networks to Identify Stellar Feedback Bubbles in CO Emission

We adopt the deep learning method CASI (Convolutional Approach to Shell Identification) and extend it to 3D (CASI-3D) to identify signatures of stellar feedback in molecular line spectra, such as 13CO. We adopt magneto-hydrodynamics simulations that study the impact of stellar winds in a turbulent molecular cloud as an input to generate synthetic observations. We apply the 3D radiation transfer code radmc-3d to model 13CO (J=1-0) line emission from the simulated clouds. We train two CASI-3d models: ME1 predicts only the position of feedback, while MF predicts the fraction of the mass coming from feedback in each voxel. We adopt 75% of the synthetic observations as the training set and assess the accuracy of the two models with the remaining data. We demonstrate that model ME1 identifies bubbles in simulated data with 95% accuracy, and model MF predicts the bubble mass within 4% of the true value. We use bubbles previously visually identified in Taurus in 13CO to validate the models and show both perform well on the highest confidence bubbles. We apply our two models on the full 98 deg2 FCRAO 13CO survey of the Taurus cloud. Models ME1 and MF predict feedback gas mass of 2894 M and 302 M, respectively. When including a correction factor for missing energy due to the limited velocity range of the 13CO data cube, model ME1 predicts feedback kinetic energies of 4.0*1e46 ergs and 1.5*1e47 ergs with/without subtracting the cloud velocity gradient. Model MF predicts feedback kinetic energy of 9.6*1e45 ergs and 2.8*1e46 ergs with/without subtracting the cloud velocity gradient. Model ME1 predicts bubble locations and properties consistent with previous visually identified bubbles. However, model MF demonstrates that feedback properties computed based on visual identifications are significantly overestimated due to line of sight confusion and contamination from background and foreground gas.