Researcher profile

Clayton Lindsay

Clayton Lindsay contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 11 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
1works
0followers
1topics
2close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

1 published item(s)

preprint2021arXiv

Experimental validation of Fastcat kV and MV cone beam CT (CBCT) simulator

Purpose: To experimentally validate the Fastcat cone beam CT (CBCT) simulator against kV and MV CBCT images acquired with a Varian Truebeam linac. Methods: kV and MV CBCT images of a Catphan 504 phantom were acquired using a 100 kVp beam with the on-board imager (OBI) and a 6 MV treatment beam with the electronic portal imaging device (EPID), respectively. The kV Fastcat simulation was performed using detailed models of the x-ray source, bowtie filter, a high resolution voxelized virtual Catphan phantom, anti-scatter grid, and the CsI scintillating detector. Likewise, an MV Fastcat CBCT was simulated with detailed models for the beam energy spectrum, flattening filter, a high resolution voxelized virtual Catphan phantom, and the GOS scintillating detector. Experimental and simulated CBCT images of the phantom were compared with respect to HU values, contrast to noise ratio (CNR),and dose linearity. Detector modulation transfer function (MTF) for the two detectors were also experimentally validated. Fastcat's dose calculations were compared to MC dose calculations performed with Topas. Results: For the kV and MV simulations, respectively: Contrast agreed within 14 and 9 HUs and detector MTF agreed within 4.2% and 2.5%. Likewise, CNR had a root mean squared error (RMSE) of 2.6% and 1.4%. Dose agreed within 2.4% and 1.6% of MC values. The kV and MV CBCT images took 71 and 72 seconds to simulate in Fastcat with 887 and 493 projections, respectively. Conclusions: We present a multi energy experimental validation of a fast and accurate CBCT simulator against a commercial linac. The simulator is open source and all models found in this work can be downloaded from https://github.com/jerichooconnell/fastcat.git