Researcher profile

Claudia Picardi

Claudia Picardi contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2014arXiv

Should I Stay or Should I Go? Improving Event Recommendation in the Social Web

This paper focuses on the recommendation of events in the Social Web, and addresses the problem of finding if, and to which extent, certain features, which are peculiar to events, are relevant in predicting the users' interests and should thereby be taken into account in recommendation. We consider in particular three "additional" features that are usually shown to users within social networking environments: reachability from the user location, the reputation of the event in the community, and the participation of the user's friends. Our study is aimed at evaluating whether adding this information to the description of the event type and topic, and including in the user profile the information on the relevance of these factors, can improve our capability to predict the user's interest. We approached the problem by carrying out two surveys with users, who were asked to express %with a score their interest in a number of events. We then trained, by means of linear regression, a scoring function defined as a linear combination of the different factors, whose goal was to predict the user scores. We repeated this experiment under different hypotheses on the additional factors, in order to assess their relevance by comparing the predictive capabilities of the resulting functions. The compared results of our experiments show that additional factors, if properly weighted, can improve the prediction accuracy with an error reduction of 4.1%. The best results were obtained by combining content-based factors and additional factors in a proportion of approximately 10:4.

preprint2011arXiv

Drawing Sound Conclusions from Unsound Premises

Given sets $Φ_1=\{ϕ_{11},...,ϕ_{1u(1)}\}, ...,Φ_{z}=\{ϕ_{z1},...,ϕ_{zu(z)}\}$ of boolean formulas, a formula $ω$ follows from the conjunction $\bigwedgeΦ_i= \bigwedge ϕ_{ij}$ iff $\neg ω\wedge \bigwedge_{i=1}^z Φ_i$ is unsatisfiable. Now assume that, given integers $0\leq e_i < u(i)$, we must check if $\neg ω\wedge \bigwedge_{i=1}^z Φ&#39;_i$ remains unsatisfiable, where $Φ&#39;_i\subseteq Φ_i$ is obtained by deleting $\,\,e_{i}$ arbitrarily chosen formulas of $Φ_i$, for each $i=1,...,z.$ Intuitively, does $ω$ {\it stably} follow, after removing $e_i$ random formulas from each $Φ_i$? We construct a quadratic reduction of this problem to the consequence problem in infinite-valued \luk\ logic Ł$_\infty$. In this way we obtain a self-contained proof that the Ł$_\infty$-consequence problem is coNP-complete.