Source author record

Claudia Picardi

Explore this author’s publications, collaborators and research topics. This catalog record has not been claimed by its author.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

Research overview

2works
3topics
4close collaborators

Published work

2 publications

preprint2014arXiv

Should I Stay or Should I Go? Improving Event Recommendation in the Social Web

This paper focuses on the recommendation of events in the Social Web, and addresses the problem of finding if, and to which extent, certain features, which are peculiar to events, are relevant in predicting the users' interests and should thereby be taken into account in recommendation. We consider in particular three "additional" features that are usually shown to users within social networking environments: reachability from the user location, the reputation of the event in the community, and the participation of the user's friends. Our study is aimed at evaluating whether adding this information to the description of the event type and topic, and including in the user profile the information on the relevance of these factors, can improve our capability to predict the user's interest. We approached the problem by carrying out two surveys with users, who were asked to express %with a score their interest in a number of events. We then trained, by means of linear regression, a scoring function defined as a linear combination of the different factors, whose goal was to predict the user scores. We repeated this experiment under different hypotheses on the additional factors, in order to assess their relevance by comparing the predictive capabilities of the resulting functions. The compared results of our experiments show that additional factors, if properly weighted, can improve the prediction accuracy with an error reduction of 4.1%. The best results were obtained by combining content-based factors and additional factors in a proportion of approximately 10:4.

preprint2011arXiv

Drawing Sound Conclusions from Unsound Premises

Given sets Φ1={ϕ11,...,ϕ1u(1)},...,Φz={ϕz1,...,ϕzu(z)}Φ_1=\{ϕ_{11},...,ϕ_{1u(1)}\}, ...,Φ_{z}=\{ϕ_{z1},...,ϕ_{zu(z)}\} of boolean formulas, a formula ωω follows from the conjunction ⋀Φi=⋀ϕij\bigwedgeΦ_i= \bigwedge ϕ_{ij} iff ¬ω∧⋀i=1zΦi\neg ω\wedge \bigwedge_{i=1}^z Φ_i is unsatisfiable. Now assume that, given integers 0≤ei<u(i)0\leq e_i < u(i), we must check if ¬ω∧⋀i=1zΦi′\neg ω\wedge \bigwedge_{i=1}^z Φ'_i remains unsatisfiable, where Φi′⊆ΦiΦ'_i\subseteq Φ_i is obtained by deleting   ei\,\,e_{i} arbitrarily chosen formulas of ΦiΦ_i, for each i=1,...,z.i=1,...,z. Intuitively, does ωω {\it stably} follow, after removing eie_i random formulas from each ΦiΦ_i? We construct a quadratic reduction of this problem to the consequence problem in infinite-valued \luk\ logic Ł∞_\infty. In this way we obtain a self-contained proof that the Ł∞_\infty-consequence problem is coNP-complete.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.