BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Christos C. Frangos

Christos C. Frangos contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Methodologystat.OT

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - Baseline
3works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2015arXiv

Exploring the Distribution for the Estimator of Rosenthal's 'Fail-Safe' Number of Unpublished Studies in Meta-analysis

The present paper discusses the statistical distribution for the estimator of Rosenthal's 'Fail-Safe' number NR, which is an estimator of unpublished studies in meta-analysis. We calculate the probability distribution function of NR. This is achieved based on the Central Limit Theorem and the proposition that certain components of the estimator NR follow a half normal distribution, derived from the standard normal distribution. Our proposed distributions are supported by simulations and investigation of convergence.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Publication Bias in Meta-Analysis: Confidence Intervals for Rosenthal's Fail-Safe Number

The purpose of the present paper is to assess the efficacy of confidence intervals for Rosenthal's fail-safe number. Although Rosenthal's estimator is highly used by researchers, its statistical properties are largely unexplored. First of all, we developed statistical theory which allowed us to produce confidence intervals for Rosenthal's fail-safe number.This was produced by discerning whether the number of studies analysed in a meta-analysis is fixed or random. Each case produces different variance estimators. For a given number of studies and a given distribution, we provided five variance estimators. Confidence intervals are examined with a normal approximation and a nonparametric bootstrap. The accuracy of the different confidence interval estimates was then tested by methods of simulation under different distributional assumptions. The half normal distribution variance estimator has the best probability coverage. Finally, we provide a table of lower confidence intervals for Rosenthal's estimator.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

The Assessment of Performance of Correlation Estimates in Discrete Bivariate Distributions Using Bootstrap Methodology

Little attention has been given to the correlation coefficient when data come from discrete or continuous non-normal populations. In this article, we consider the efficiency of two correlation coefficients which are from the same family, Pearson's and Spearman's estimators. Two discrete bivariate distributions were examined: the Poisson and the Negative Binomial. The comparison between these two estimators took place using classical and bootstrap techniques for the construction of confidence intervals. Thus, these techniques are also subject to comparison. Simulation studies were also used for the relative efficiency and bias of the two estimators. Pearson's estimator performed slightly better than Spearman's.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access