Researcher profile

Chris C. T. Pringle

Chris C. T. Pringle contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
1topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2019arXiv

Simultaneous Eulerian-Lagrangian velocity measurements of particulate pipe flow in transitional regime

We present a unique pipe flow rig capable where simultaneous particle tracking and flow velocity measurements in a dilute, neutrally buoyant particulate pipe flow in regimes of transition to turbulence. The flow consists of solid glass spheres for the disperse phase, and a density-matching fluid for the carrier phase. The measurements are conducted using a bespoke, combined 2D PIV/ PTV technique. The technique takes advantage of a phase discrimination approach that involves separating the disperse and carrier phases based on their respective image characteristics. Our results show that the rig and the technique it implements can be employed to study transitional particulate pipe flows at dilute concentration.

preprint2014arXiv

Fully localised nonlinear energy growth optimals in pipe flow

A new, fully-localised, energy growth optimal is found over large times and in long pipe domains at a given mass flow rate. This optimal emerges at a threshold disturbance energy below which a nonlinear version of the known (streamwise-independent) linear optimal (Schmid \& Henningson 1994) is selected, and appears to remain the optimal up until the critical energy at which transition is triggered. The form of this optimal is similar to that found in short pipes (Pringle et al.\ 2012) albeit now with full localisation in the streamwise direction. This fully-localised optimal perturbation represents the best approximation yet of the {\em minimal seed} (the smallest perturbation capable of triggering a turbulent episode) for `real' (laboratory) pipe flows.

preprint2010arXiv

On Constructing the Minimal Seed of Turbulence: Nonlinear Transient Growth

Linear transient growth analysis is commonly used to suggest the structure of disturbances which are particularly efficient in triggering transition to turbulence in shear flows. We demonstrate that the addition of nonlinearity to the analysis can substantially change the prediction made in pipe flow from simple 2 dimensional streamwise rolls to a spanwise and cross-stream localised 3 dimensional state. This new nonlinear optimal is demonstrably more efficient in triggering turbulence than the linear optimal indicating that there are better ways to design perturbations to achieve transition.

preprint2010arXiv

Transient Growth in Shear Flows: Linearity vs Nonlinearity

Two approaches to the problem of transition to turbulence of shear flows are popular in the literature. The first is the linear one of transient growth which focuses on the likely form of the most 'dangerous' (lowest energy) turbulence-triggering disturbances. The second is the nonlinear calculation of the laminar-turbulent boundary which instead focuses on their typical amplitudes. We look to bridge the gap between these two perspectives by considering the fully nonlinear transient growth problem to estimate both the form and amplitude of the most dangerous disturbance. We thereby discover a new nonlinear optimal disturbance which outgrows the well-known linear optimal for the same initial energy and is crucially much more efficient in triggering turbulence. The conclusion is then that the most dangerous disturbance can differ markedly from what traditional linear transient growth analysis predicts.