BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Chia-Jung Lee

Chia-Jung Lee contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
cs.CYHuman-Computer InteractionInformation Retrieval

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2021arXiv

Large Scale Analysis of Multitasking Behavior During Remote Meetings

Virtual meetings are critical for remote work because of the need for synchronous collaboration in the absence of in-person interactions. In-meeting multitasking is closely linked to people's productivity and wellbeing. However, we currently have limited understanding of multitasking in remote meetings and its potential impact. In this paper, we present what we believe is the most comprehensive study of remote meeting multitasking behavior through an analysis of a large-scale telemetry dataset collected from February to May 2020 of U.S. Microsoft employees and a 715-person diary study. Our results demonstrate that intrinsic meeting characteristics such as size, length, time, and type, significantly correlate with the extent to which people multitask, and multitasking can lead to both positive and negative outcomes. Our findings suggest important best-practice guidelines for remote meetings (e.g., avoid important meetings in the morning) and design implications for productivity tools (e.g., support positive remote multitasking).

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Characterizing Reading Time on Enterprise Emails

Email is an integral part of people's work and life, enabling them to perform activities such as communicating, searching, managing tasks and storing information. Modern email clients take a step forward and help improve users' productivity by automatically creating reminders, tasks or responses. The act of reading is arguably the only activity that is in common in most -- if not all -- of the interactions that users have with their emails. In this paper, we characterize how users read their enterprise emails, and reveal the various contextual factors that impact reading time. Our approach starts with a reading time analysis based on the reading events from a major email platform, followed by a user study to provide explanations for some discoveries. We identify multiple temporal and user contextual factors that are correlated with reading time. For instance, email reading time is correlated with user devices: on desktop reading time increases through the morning and peaks at noon but on mobile it increases through the evening till midnight. The reading time is also negatively correlated with the screen size. We have established the connection between user status and reading time: users spend more time reading emails when they have fewer meetings and busy hours during the day. In addition, we find that users also reread emails across devices. Among the cross-device reading events, 76% of reread emails are first visited on mobile and then on desktop. Overall, our study is the first to characterize enterprise email reading time on a very large scale. The findings provide insights to develop better metrics and user models for understanding and improving email interactions.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access