Researcher profile

Chenxiao Zeng

Chenxiao Zeng contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
1topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Optical selection bias and projection effects in stacked galaxy cluster weak lensing

Cosmological constraints from current and upcoming galaxy cluster surveys are limited by the accuracy of cluster mass calibration. In particular, optically identified galaxy clusters are prone to selection effects that can bias the weak lensing mass calibration. We investigate the selection bias of the stacked cluster lensing signal associated with optically selected clusters, using clusters identified by the redMaPPer algorithm in the Buzzard simulations as a case study. We find that at a given cluster halo mass, the residuals of redMaPPer richness and weak lensing signal are positively correlated. As a result, for a given richness selection, the stacked lensing signal is biased high compared with what we would expect from the underlying halo mass probability distribution. The cluster lensing selection bias can thus lead to overestimated mean cluster mass and biased cosmology results. We show that the lensing selection bias exhibits a strong scale-dependence and is approximately 20 to 60 percent for $ΔΣ$ at large scales. This selection bias largely originates from spurious member galaxies within +/- 20 to 60 Mpc/h along the line of sight, highlighting the importance of quantifying projection effects associated with the broad redshift distribution of member galaxies in photometric cluster surveys. While our results qualitatively agree with those in the literature, accurate quantitative modelling of the selection bias is needed to achieve the goals of cluster lensing cosmology and will require synthetic catalogues covering a wide range of galaxy-halo connection models.

preprint2020arXiv

Non-equilibrium temperature evolution of ionization fronts during the Epoch of Reionization

The epoch of reionization (EoR) marks the end of the Cosmic Dawn and the beginning of large-scale structure formation in the universe. The impulsive ionization fronts (I-fronts) heat and ionize the gas within the reionization bubbles in the intergalactic medium (IGM). The temperature during this process is a key yet uncertain ingredient in current models. Typically, reionization simulations assume that all baryonic species are in instantaneous thermal equilibrium with each other during the passage of an I-front. Here we present a new model of the temperature evolution for the ionization front by studying non-equilibrium effects. In particular, we include the energy transfer between major baryon species ($e^{-}$, \HI, \HII, \HeI, and \HeII) and investigate their impacts on the post-ionization front temperature $T_{\mathrm{re}}$. For a better step-size control when solving the stiff equations, we implement an implicit method and construct an energy transfer rate matrix. We find that the assumption of equilibration is valid for a low-speed ionization front ($\lessapprox\ 10^9~\mathrm{cm}/\mathrm{s}$), but deviations from equilibrium occur for faster fronts. The post-front temperature $T_{\mathrm{re}}$ is lower by up to 19.7\% (at $3\times 10^9$ cm/s) or 30.8\% (at $10^{10}$ cm/s) relative to the equilibrium case.