BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Chenfei Xie

Chenfei Xie contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
eess.SPInformation Theorymath.IT

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Channel Estimation for Reconfigurable Intelligent Surface-Assisted Cell-Free Communications

Recent research has focused on reconfigurable intelligent surface (RIS)-assisted cell-free systems with the goal of enhancing coverage and lowering the cost of cell-free networks. However, current research makes the assumption that the perfect channel state information is known. Channel acquisition is, certainly, a difficulty in this case. This work is aimed at investigating RIS-assisted cell-free channel estimation. Toward this end, two unique characteristics are pointed out: 1) For all users, a common channel exists between the base station (BS) and the RIS; and 2) For all BSs, a common channel exists between the RIS and the user. Based on these two characteristics, cascaded and two-timescale channel estimation concerns are studied. Subsequently, two solutions for tackling with the two issues are presented respectively: a three-dimensional multiple measurement vector (3D-MMV)-based compressive sensing technique and a multi-BS cooperative pilot-reduced methodology. Finally, simulations illustrate the effectiveness of the schemes we have presented.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Fast Compressive Channel Estimation for MmWave MIMO Hybrid Beamforming Systems

Given the high degree of computational complexity of the channel estimation technique based on the conventional one-dimensional (1-D) compressive sensing (CS) framework employed in the hybrid beamforming architecture, this study proposes two low-complexity channel estimation strategies. One is two-stage CS, which exploits row-group sparsity to estimate angle-of-arrival (AoA) first and uses the conventional 1-D CS method to obtain angle-of-departure (AoD). The other is two-dimensional (2-D) CS, which utilizes a 2-D dictionary to reconstruct the 2-D sparse signal. To conduct a meaningful comparison of the three CS frameworks, i.e., 1-D, two-stage and 2-D CS, the orthogonal match pursuit (OMP) algorithm is employed as the basic algorithm and is expanded to two variants for the proposed frameworks. Analysis and simulations demonstrate that when the 1-D CS method is compared, two-stage CS has somewhat lower performance but significantly lower computational complexity, while 2-D CS is not only the same as 1-D CS in terms of performance but also slightly lower in computational complexity than two-stage CS.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access