Source author record

Charles T. Perretti

Charles T. Perretti appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

2works
1topics
3close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2015arXiv

Global evidence for non-random dynamics in fish recruitment

Understanding what controls apparently random fluctuations in fish recruitment is a major challenge in fisheries science. Our current inability to anticipate recruitment failures has led to costly management actions and in some cases complete fishery collapse. Time series observations of fish recruitment reflect an interplay of underlying population processes, environmental forcing, measurement error, and process error. Given that the error component is often very strong, an important unresolved question is whether any non-random signal can be uncovered in the annual fluctuations of recruitment time series. Here, we address this fundamental question in an analysis of 569 fish populations from a global database of recruitment. Using a nonparametric time series analysis method, we find overwhelming evidence for non-random dynamics operating in the recruitment process. Unlike previous explorations of this topic, our approach does not require the specification of a stock-recruitment model, and it can be used on recruitment estimates derived from a wide-range of abundance estimation methods. The evidence for non-randomness is robust across a wide range of fish families and abundance estimation methods. We also find that the statistical support for non-randomness increases consistently with the number of observations of a fish stock. This result provides the encouraging news that with continued observations, and the appropriate covariates, we should ultimately be able to uncover the mechanistic drivers of fish recruitment.

preprint2013arXiv

Reply to Hartig et al. [arXiv:1305.3544]: The "true model" myth

We have shown that commonly used model-fitting methods fail when the underlying ecological system is chaotic. Importantly, Hartig & Dormann [arXiv:1305.3544] suggest an alternative method that is able to overcome this problem for the logistic model when the "true model" is known. This is encouraging, however the more relevant test is of the method when the "true model" is unknown, as it always is for real ecosystems. By making a small modification to the "true model," we find that the suggested method provides inaccurate forecasts and severely biased estimates of the ecological dynamics. In contrast, a model-free approach is able to provide accurate forecasts and a useful foundation for ecological understanding without the burdensome assumption of a "true model."