BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Charles Semple

Charles Semple contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
math.COPopulations and EvolutionData Structures and Algorithms

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
6works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

6 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

A splitter theorem for elastic elements in $3$-connected matroids

An element $e$ of a $3$-connected matroid $M$ is elastic if ${\rm si}(M/e)$, the simplification of $M/e$, and ${\rm co}(M\backslash e)$, the cosimplification of $M\backslash e$, are both $3$-connected. It was recently shown that if $|E(M)|\geq 4$, then $M$ has at least four elastic elements provided $M$ has no $4$-element fans and no member of a specific family of $3$-separators. In this paper, we extend this wheels-and-whirls type result to a splitter theorem, where the removal of elements is with respect to elasticity and keeping a specified $3$-connected minor. We also prove that if $M$ has exactly four elastic elements, then it has path-width three. Lastly, we resolve a question of Whittle and Williams, and show that past analogous results, where the removal of elements is relative to a fixed basis, are consequences of this work.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Counting and optimising maximum phylogenetic diversity sets

In conservation biology, phylogenetic diversity (PD) provides a way to quantify the impact of the current rapid extinction of species on the evolutionary `Tree of Life'. This approach recognises that extinction not only removes species but also the branches of the tree on which unique features shared by the extinct species arose. In this paper, we investigate three questions that are relevant to PD. The first asks how many sets of species of given size $k$ preserve the maximum possible amount of PD in a given tree. The number of such maximum PD sets can be very large, even for moderate-sized phylogenies. We provide a combinatorial characterisation of maximum PD sets, focusing on the setting where the branch lengths are ultrametric (e.g. proportional to time). This leads to a polynomial-time algorithm for calculating the number of maximum PD sets of size $k$ by applying a generating function; we also investigate the types of tree shapes that harbour the most (or fewest) maximum PD sets of size $k$. Our second question concerns optimising a linear function on the species (regarded as leaves of the phylogenetic tree) across all the maximum PD sets of a given size. Using the characterisation result from the first question, we show how this optimisation problem can be solved in polynomial time, even though the number of maximum PD sets can grow exponentially. Our third question considers a dual problem: If $k$ species were to become extinct, then what is the largest possible {\em loss} of PD in the resulting tree? For this question, we describe a polynomial-time solution based on dynamical programming.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Cyclic matroids

For all positive integers $s$ and $t$ exceeding one, a matroid $M$ on $n$ elements is {\em nearly $(s, t)$-cyclic} if there is a cyclic ordering $σ$ of its ground set such that every $s-1$ consecutive elements of $σ$ are contained in an $s$-element circuit and every $t-1$ consecutive elements of $σ$ are contained in a $t$-element cocircuit. In the case $s=t$, nearly $(s, s)$-cyclic matroids have been studied previously. In this paper, we show that if $M$ is nearly $(s, t)$-cyclic and $n$ is sufficiently large, then these $s$-element circuits and $t$-element cocircuits are consecutive in $σ$ in a prescribed way, that is, $M$ is "$(s, t)$-cyclic". Furthermore, we show that, given $s$ and $t$ where $t\ge s$, every $(s, t)$-cyclic matroid on $n > s+t-2$ elements is a weak-map image of the $\left(\frac{t-s}{2}\right)$-th truncation of a certain $(s, s)$-cyclic matroid. If $s=3$, this certain matroid is the rank-$\frac{n}{2}$ whirl, and if $s=4$, this certain matroid is the rank-$\frac{n}{2}$ free swirl.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2019arXiv

A class of phylogenetic networks reconstructable from ancestral profiles

Rooted phylogenetic networks provide an explicit representation of the evolutionary history of a set $X$ of sampled species. In contrast to phylogenetic trees which show only speciation events, networks can also accommodate reticulate processes (for example, hybrid evolution, endosymbiosis, and lateral gene transfer). A major goal in systematic biology is to infer evolutionary relationships, and while phylogenetic trees can be uniquely determined from various simple combinatorial data on $X$, for networks the reconstruction question is much more subtle. Here we ask when can a network be uniquely reconstructed from its `ancestral profile' (the number of paths from each ancestral vertex to each element in $X$). We show that reconstruction holds (even within the class of all networks) for a class of networks we call `orchard networks', and we provide a polynomial-time algorithm for reconstructing any orchard network from its ancestral profile. Our approach relies on establishing a structural theorem for orchard networks, which also provides for a fast (polynomial-time) algorithm to test if any given network is of orchard type. Since the class of orchard networks includes tree-sibling tree-consistent networks and tree-child networks, our result generalise reconstruction results from 2008 and 2009. Orchard networks allow for an unbounded number $k$ of reticulation vertices, in contrast to tree-sibling tree-consistent networks and tree-child networks for which $k$ is at most $2|X|-4$ and $|X|-1$, respectively.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2018arXiv

Excluded minors are almost fragile

Let $M$ be an excluded minor for the class of $\mathbb{P}$-representable matroids for some partial field $\mathbb P$, and let $N$ be a $3$-connected strong $\mathbb{P}$-stabilizer that is non-binary. We prove that either $M$ is bounded relative to $N$, or, up to replacing $M$ by a $Δ$-$Y$-equivalent excluded minor, we can choose a pair of elements $\{a,b\}$ such that either $M\backslash \{a,b\}$ is $N$-fragile, or $M^* \backslash \{a,b\}$ is $N^*$-fragile.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

Locating a tree in a phylogenetic network

Phylogenetic trees and networks are leaf-labelled graphs that are used to describe evolutionary histories of species. The Tree Containment problem asks whether a given phylogenetic tree is embedded in a given phylogenetic network. Given a phylogenetic network and a cluster of species, the Cluster Containment problem asks whether the given cluster is a cluster of some phylogenetic tree embedded in the network. Both problems are known to be NP-complete in general. In this article, we consider the restriction of these problems to several well-studied classes of phylogenetic networks. We show that Tree Containment is polynomial-time solvable for normal networks, for binary tree-child networks, and for level-$k$ networks. On the other hand, we show that, even for tree-sibling, time-consistent, regular networks, both Tree Containment and Cluster Containment remain NP-complete.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access