Source author record

Changhao Yi

Changhao Yi appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

quant-ph

Catalog footprint

What is connected

3works

1topics

1close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Open graph Browse works

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

preprint2026arXiv

Certifying entanglement dimensionality by random Pauli sampling

We introduce a Pauli-measurement-based algorithm to certify the Schmidt number of $n$-qubit pure states. Our protocol achieves an average-case sample complexity of $\caO(\mathrm{poly}(n)χ^2)$, a substantial improvement over the $\caO(2^n χ)$ worst-case bound. By utilizing local pseudorandom unitaries, we ensure the worst case can be transformed into the average-case with high probability. This work establishes a scalable approach to high-dimensional entanglement certification and introduces a proof framework for random Pauli sampling.

preprint2022arXiv

Success of digital adiabatic simulation with large Trotter step

The simulation of adiabatic evolution has deep connections with Adiabatic Quantum Computation, the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm and adiabatic state preparation. Here we address the error analysis problem in quantum simulation of adiabatic process using Trotter formulas. We show that with additional conditions, the circuit depth can be linear in simulation time $T$. The improvement comes from the observation that the fidelity error here can't be estimated by the norm distance between evolution operators. This phenomenon is termed as the robustness of discretization in digital adiabatic simulation. It can be explained in three steps, from analytical and numerical evidence: (1). The fidelity error should be estimated by applying adiabatic theorem on the effective Hamiltonian instead. (2). Because of the specialty of Riemann-Lebesgue lemma, most adiabatic process is naturally robust against discretization. (3). As the Trotter step gets larger, the spectral gap of effective Hamiltonian tends to close, which results in the failure of digital adiabatic simulation.

preprint2021arXiv

Spectral Analysis of Product Formulas for Quantum Simulation

We consider Hamiltonian simulation using the first order Lie-Trotter product formula under the assumption that the initial state has a high overlap with an energy eigenstate, or a collection of eigenstates in a narrow energy band. This assumption is motivated by quantum phase estimation (QPE) and digital adiabatic simulation (DAS). Treating the effective Hamiltonian that generates the Trotterized time evolution using rigorous perturbative methods, we show that the Trotter step size needed to estimate an energy eigenvalue within precision $ε$ using QPE can be improved in scaling from $ε$ to $ε^{1/2}$ for a large class of systems (including any Hamiltonian which can be decomposed as a sum of local terms or commuting layers that each have real-valued matrix elements). For DAS we improve the asymptotic scaling of the Trotter error with the total number of gates $M$ from $\mathcal{O}(M^{-1})$ to $\mathcal{O}(M^{-2})$, and for any fixed circuit depth we calculate an approximately optimal step size that balances the error contributions from Trotterization and the adiabatic approximation. These results partially generalize to diabatic processes, which remain in a narrow energy band separated from the rest of the spectrum by a gap, thereby contributing to the explanation of the observed similarities between the quantum approximate optimization algorithm and diabatic quantum annealing at small system sizes. Our analysis depends on the perturbation of eigenvectors as well as eigenvalues, and on quantifying the error using state fidelity (instead of the matrix norm of the difference of unitaries which is sensitive to an overall global phase).