Researcher profile

Cédric Lauradoux

Cédric Lauradoux contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
1topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Can Authoritative Governments Abuse the Right to Access?

The right to access is a great tool provided by the GDPR to empower data subjects with their data. However, it needs to be implemented properly otherwise it could turn subject access requests against the subjects privacy. Indeed, recent works have shown that it is possible to abuse the right to access using impersonation attacks. We propose to extend those impersonation attacks by considering that the adversary has an access to governmental resources. In this case, the adversary can forge official documents or exploit copy of them. Our attack affects more people than one may expect. To defeat the attacks from this kind of adversary, several solutions are available like multi-factors or proof of aliveness. Our attacks highlight the need for strong procedures to authenticate subject access requests.

preprint2021arXiv

Can You Accept LaTeX Files from Strangers? Ten Years Later

It is well-known that Microsoft Word/Excel compatible documents or PDF files can contain malicious content. LaTeX files are unfortunately no exception either. LaTeX users often include third-party codes through sources or packages (.sty or .cls files). But those packages can execute malicious commands on the users' system, in order to capture sensitive information or to perform denial of service attacks. Checkoway et al. [3] were the first to warn LaTeX users of these threats. Collaborative cloud-based LaTeX editors and services compiling LaTeX sources are particularly concerned. In this paper, we have created a LaTeX package that collects system data and hides them inside the PDF file produced by the target. Then, we have measured what can be recovered by hackers using malicious LaTeX file on online services, and which measures those services have enforced to thwart the threats. Services defend themselves using sandbox or commands restrictions. Commands restrictions are more difficult to setup and we found one service (PMLatex) which is too permissive.

preprint2021arXiv

Robust PDF Files Forensics Using Coding Style

Identifying how a file has been created is often interesting in security. It can be used by both attackers and defenders. Attackers can exploit this information to tune their attacks and defenders can understand how a malicious file has been created after an incident. In this work, we want to identify how a PDF file has been created. This problem is important because PDF files are extremely popular: many organizations publish PDF files online and malicious PDF files are commonly used by attackers. Our approach to detect which software has been used to produce a PDF file is based on coding style: given patterns that are only created by certain PDF producers. We have analyzed the coding style of 900 PDF files produced using 11 PDF producers on 3 different Operating Systems. We have obtained a set of 192 rules which can be used to identify 11 PDF producers. We have tested our detection tool on 508836 PDF files published on scientific preprints servers. Our tool is able to detect certain producers with an accuracy of 100%. Its overall detection is still high (74%). We were able to apply our tool to identify how online PDF services work and to spot inconsistency.

preprint2020arXiv

DESIRE: A Third Way for a European Exposure Notification System Leveraging the best of centralized and decentralized systems

This document presents an evolution of the ROBERT protocol that decentralizes most of its operations on the mobile devices. DESIRE is based on the same architecture than ROBERT but implements major privacy improvements. In particular, it introduces the concept of Private Encounter Tokens, that are secret and cryptographically generated, to encode encounters. In the DESIRE protocol, the temporary Identifiers that are broadcast on the Bluetooth interfaces are generated by the mobile devices providing more control to the users about which ones to disclose. The role of the server is merely to match PETs generated by diagnosed users with the PETs provided by requesting users. It stores minimal pseudonymous data. Finally, all data that are stored on the server are encrypted using keys that are stored on the mobile devices, protecting against data breach on the server. All these modifications improve the privacy of the scheme against malicious users and authority. However, as in the first version of ROBERT, risk scores and notifications are still managed and controlled by the server of the health authority, which provides high robustness, flexibility, and efficacy.