BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Caroline Turnage-Butterbaugh

Caroline Turnage-Butterbaugh appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
math.NT

Catalog footprint

What is connected

5works
1topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

5 published item(s)

preprint2016arXiv

Some Results in the Theory of Low-lying Zeros: Determining the 1-level density, identifying the group symmetry and the arithmetic of moments of Satake parameters

While Random Matrix Theory has successfully modeled many quantities of families of L-functions, it frequently cannot see the family's arithmetic. In some situations this requires an extended theory that inserts arithmetic factors depending on the family, while in other cases these factors result in contributions which vanish in the limit, and are thus not detected. We review the general theory associated to one of the most important statistics, the n-level density of zeros near the central point. According to the Katz-Sarnak density conjecture, to each family of L-functions there is a corresponding symmetry group such that the behavior of zeros near the central point as the conductors tend to infinity agrees with the behavior of eigenvalues near 1 as the matrix size tends to infinity. We show how these calculations are done, emphasizing the techniques, methods and obstructions to improving the results, by considering in full detail a family of Dirichlet characters. We then describe how we may associate a symmetry constant to each family, and how to determine the symmetry group of a compound family in terms of the symmetries of the constituents. These calculations explain the remarkable universality of behavior, where the main terms are independent of the arithmetic (only the first two moments of the Satake parameters contribute in the limit; similar to the Central Limit Theorem, the higher moments are only felt in the rate of convergence). We end by exploring lower order terms in families of elliptic curves. We present evidence supporting a conjecture that the average second moment in one-parameter families without complex multiplication has, when appropriately viewed, a negative bias, and end with a discussion of the consequences of this bias on the distribution of low-lying zeros, in particular relations between such a bias and the observed excess rank in families.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Gaussian Distribution of the Number of Summands in Generalized Zeckendorf Decompositions in Small Intervals

Zeckendorf's theorem states that every positive integer can be written uniquely as a sum of non-consecutive Fibonacci numbers ${F_n}$, with initial terms $F_1 = 1, F_2 = 2$. Previous work proved that as $n \to \infty$ the distribution of the number of summands in the Zeckendorf decompositions of $m \in [F_n, F_{n+1})$, appropriately normalized, converges to the standard normal. The proofs crucially used the fact that all integers in $[F_n, F_{n+1})$ share the same potential summands and hold for more general positive linear recurrence sequences $\{G_n\}$. We generalize these results to subintervals of $[G_n, G_{n+1})$ as $n \to \infty$ for certain sequences. The analysis is significantly more involved here as different integers have different sets of potential summands. Explicitly, fix an integer sequence $α(n) \to \infty$. As $n \to \infty$, for almost all $m \in [G_n, G_{n+1})$ the distribution of the number of summands in the generalized Zeckendorf decompositions of integers in the subintervals $[m, m + G_{α(n)})$, appropriately normalized, converges to the standard normal. The proof follows by showing that, with probability tending to $1$, $m$ has at least one appropriately located large gap between indices in its decomposition. We then use a correspondence between this interval and $[0, G_{α(n)})$ to obtain the result, since the summands are known to have Gaussian behavior in the latter interval.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Benford Behavior of Generalized Zeckendorf Decompositions

We prove connections between Zeckendorf decompositions and Benford's law. Recall that if we define the Fibonacci numbers by $F_1 = 1, F_2 = 2$ and $F_{n+1} = F_n + F_{n-1}$, every positive integer can be written uniquely as a sum of non-adjacent elements of this sequence; this is called the Zeckendorf decomposition, and similar unique decompositions exist for sequences arising from recurrence relations of the form $G_{n+1}=c_1G_n+\cdots+c_LG_{n+1-L}$ with $c_i$ positive and some other restrictions. Additionally, a set $S \subset \mathbb{Z}$ is said to satisfy Benford's law base 10 if the density of the elements in $S$ with leading digit $d$ is $\log_{10}{(1+\frac{1}{d})}$; in other words, smaller leading digits are more likely to occur. We prove that as $n\to\infty$ for a randomly selected integer $m$ in $[0, G_{n+1})$ the distribution of the leading digits of the summands in its generalized Zeckendorf decomposition converges to Benford's law almost surely. Our results hold more generally: one obtains similar theorems to those regarding the distribution of leading digits when considering how often values in sets with density are attained in the summands in the decompositions.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Benford Behavior of Zeckendorf Decompositions

A beautiful theorem of Zeckendorf states that every integer can be written uniquely as the sum of non-consecutive Fibonacci numbers $\{ F_i \}_{i = 1}^{\infty}$. A set $S \subset \mathbb{Z}$ is said to satisfy Benford's law if the density of the elements in $S$ with leading digit $d$ is $\log_{10}{(1+\frac{1}{d})}$; in other words, smaller leading digits are more likely to occur. We prove that, as $n\to\infty$, for a randomly selected integer $m$ in $[0, F_{n+1})$ the distribution of the leading digits of the Fibonacci summands in its Zeckendorf decomposition converge to Benford's law almost surely. Our results hold more generally, and instead of looking at the distribution of leading digits one obtains similar theorems concerning how often values in sets with density are attained.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Gaussian Behavior of the Number of Summands in Zeckendorf Decompositions in Small Intervals

Zeckendorf's theorem states that every positive integer can be written uniquely as a sum of non-consecutive Fibonacci numbers ${F_n}$, with initial terms $F_1 = 1, F_2 = 2$. We consider the distribution of the number of summands involved in such decompositions. Previous work proved that as $n \to \infty$ the distribution of the number of summands in the Zeckendorf decompositions of $m \in [F_n, F_{n+1})$, appropriately normalized, converges to the standard normal. The proofs crucially used the fact that all integers in $[F_n, F_{n+1})$ share the same potential summands. We generalize these results to subintervals of $[F_n, F_{n+1})$ as $n \to \infty$; the analysis is significantly more involved here as different integers have different sets of potential summands. Explicitly, fix an integer sequence $α(n) \to \infty$. As $n \to \infty$, for almost all $m \in [F_n, F_{n+1})$ the distribution of the number of summands in the Zeckendorf decompositions of integers in the subintervals $[m, m + F_{α(n)})$, appropriately normalized, converges to the standard normal. The proof follows by showing that, with probability tending to $1$, $m$ has at least one appropriately located large gap between indices in its decomposition. We then use a correspondence between this interval and $[0, F_{α(n)})$ to obtain the result, since the summands are known to have Gaussian behavior in the latter interval. % We also prove the same result for more general linear recurrences.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access