Source author record

Carlos Eduardo Cancino-Chacón

Carlos Eduardo Cancino-Chacón appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

3works
6topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2023arXiv

Are we describing the same sound? An analysis of word embedding spaces of expressive piano performance

Semantic embeddings play a crucial role in natural language-based information retrieval. Embedding models represent words and contexts as vectors whose spatial configuration is derived from the distribution of words in large text corpora. While such representations are generally very powerful, they might fail to account for fine-grained domain-specific nuances. In this article, we investigate this uncertainty for the domain of characterizations of expressive piano performance. Using a music research dataset of free text performance characterizations and a follow-up study sorting the annotations into clusters, we derive a ground truth for a domain-specific semantic similarity structure. We test five embedding models and their similarity structure for correspondence with the ground truth. We further assess the effects of contextualizing prompts, hubness reduction, cross-modal similarity, and k-means clustering. The quality of embedding models shows great variability with respect to this task; more general models perform better than domain-adapted ones and the best model configurations reach human-level agreement.

preprint2023arXiv

Sounding Out Reconstruction Error-Based Evaluation of Generative Models of Expressive Performance

Generative models of expressive piano performance are usually assessed by comparing their predictions to a reference human performance. A generative algorithm is taken to be better than competing ones if it produces performances that are closer to a human reference performance. However, expert human performers can (and do) interpret music in different ways, making for different possible references, and quantitative closeness is not necessarily aligned with perceptual similarity, raising concerns about the validity of this evaluation approach. In this work, we present a number of experiments that shed light on this problem. Using precisely measured high-quality performances of classical piano music, we carry out a listening test indicating that listeners can sometimes perceive subtle performance difference that go unnoticed under quantitative evaluation. We further present tests that indicate that such evaluation frameworks show a lot of variability in reliability and validity across different reference performances and pieces. We discuss these results and their implications for quantitative evaluation, and hope to foster a critical appreciation of the uncertainties involved in quantitative assessments of such performances within the wider music information retrieval (MIR) community.

preprint2016arXiv

Towards computer-assisted understanding of dynamics in symphonic music

Many people enjoy classical symphonic music. Its diverse instrumentation makes for a rich listening experience. This diversity adds to the conductor's expressive freedom to shape the sound according to their imagination. As a result, the same piece may sound quite differently from one conductor to another. Differences in interpretation may be noticeable subjectively to listeners, but they are sometimes hard to pinpoint, presumably because of the acoustic complexity of the sound. We describe a computational model that interprets dynamics---expressive loudness variations in performances---in terms of the musical score, highlighting differences between performances of the same piece. We demonstrate experimentally that the model has predictive power, and give examples of conductor ideosyncrasies found by using the model as an explanatory tool. Although the present model is still in active development, it may pave the road for a consumer-oriented companion to interactive classical music understanding.