Source author record

Carlos Contreras V.

Carlos Contreras V. appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

1works
1topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

1 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Two years of optical and NIR observations of the superluminous supernova UID 30901 discovered by the UltraVISTA SN survey

We present deep optical and near-infrared photometry of UID 30901, a superluminous supernova (SLSN) discovered during the UltraVISTA survey. The observations were obtained with VIRCAM ($YJHK_{s}$) mounted on the VISTA telescope, DECam ($griz$) on the Blanco telescope, and SUBARU Hyper Suprime-Cam (HSC; $grizy$). These multi-band observations comprise +700 days making UID 30901 one of the best photometrically followed SLSNe to date. The host galaxy of UID 30901 is detected in a deep HST F814W image with an AB magnitude of $27.3 \pm 0.2$. While no spectra exist for the SN or its host galaxy, we perform our analysis assuming $z = 0.37$, based on the photometric redshift of a possible host galaxy found at a projected distance of 7 kpc. Fitting a blackbody to the observations, the radius, temperature, and bolometric light curve are computed. We find a maximum bolometric luminosity of $5.4 \pm 0.34 \times 10^{43}$ erg s$^{-1}$. A flattening in the light curve beyond 600 days is observed and several possible causes are discussed. We find the observations to clearly favour a SLSN type I, and plausible power sources such as the radioactive decay of $^{56}$Ni and the spin-down of a magnetar are compared to the data. We find that the magnetar model yields a good fit to the observations with the following parameters: a magnetic field $B = 1.4 \pm 0.3 \times 10^{14} \ G$, spin period of $P = 6.0 \pm 0.1 \ ms$ and ejecta mass $M_{ej} = 11.9^{+4.8}_{-6.4} M_{\odot}$.