Source author record

Cailin A. Nelson

Cailin A. Nelson appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

1works
1topics
1close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

1 published item(s)

preprint2000arXiv

The Rotation Curve of the Large Magellanic Cloud and the Implications for Microlensing

The rotation of the disk of the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC) is derived from the radial velocities of 422 carbon stars. New aspects of this analysis include the propagation of uncertainties in the LMC proper motion with a Monte Carlo, and a self-consistent modeling of the rotation curve and disk kinematics. The rotation curve is well fit by a truncated, finite-thickness exponential disk model with no dark halo. The velocity dispersion in radial bins decreases from 22 to 15 km/s, then increases to 20 km/s at larger radii. Constant-thickness models in virial equilibrium cannot be reconciled with the data even if the effects of LMC or Galactic dark halos are included. If the disk is virialized, the LMC disk is flared. We model the velocity dispersion at large radii (R > 6 kpc) as a maximal flared disk under the influence of the Galactic dark halo, which favors a mean density for the latter of 0.00025 M_sol/pc^3 at the LMC distance. LMC stellar kinematics play an important role in elucidating the nature of MACHOs, a dark population inferred from LMC microlensing. We have constructed a truncated and flared maximal disk model for the LMC which is kinematically based. Our model does not include a nonvirialized component such as tidal debris. Our upper limit on the self-lensing optical depth is in good agreement with that obtained from less sophisticated models, and is an order of magnitude too small to account for the MACHO microlensing signal [Abridged].