Source author record

C. N. Setzer

C. N. Setzer appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

1works
1topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

1 published item(s)

preprint2019arXiv

Constraining the observer angle of the kilonova AT2017gfo associated with GW170817: Implications for the Hubble constant

There is a strong degeneracy between the luminosity distance ($D_L$) and the observer viewing angle ($θ_{\rm obs}$; hereafter viewing angle) of the gravitational wave (GW) source with an electromagnetic counterpart, GW170817. Here, for the first time, we present independent constraints on $θ_{\rm obs} = 32.5 ^{\circ +11.7}_{-9.7}$ from broad-band photometry of the kilonova (kN) AT2017gfo associated with GW170817. These constraints are consistent with independent results presented in the literature using the associated gamma ray burst GRB170817A. Combining the constraints on $θ_{\rm obs}$ with the GW data, we find an improvement of 24$\%$ on $H_0$. The observer angle constraints are insensitive to other model parameters, e.g. the ejecta mass, half-opening angle of the lanthanide-rich region and the temperature. A broad wavelength coverage extending to the near infrared is helpful to robustly constrain $θ_{\rm obs}$. While the improvement on $H_0$ presented here is smaller than the one from high angular resolution imaging of the radio counterpart of GW170817, kN observations are significantly more feasible at the typical distances of such events from current and future LIGO-Virgo Collaboration observing runs ($D_L \sim 100$ Mpc). Our results are insensitive to the assumption on the peculiar velocity of the kN host galaxy.